[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5957?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16742242#comment-16742242
]
Richard Eckart de Castilho commented on UIMA-5957:
--------------------------------------------------
Got it. I agree that adding the additional constructor is probably a good idea.
I'm cautious about this because in particular in the factory methods there are
many many methods where in principle an RM could added as a additional
parameter, but it would probably lead to a significant increase in signatures.
In this case, it seems reasonable though.
> JCasIterable and JCasIterator in SimplePipeline should use the same
> ResourceManager
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: UIMA-5957
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5957
> Project: UIMA
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: uimaFIT
> Affects Versions: 2.4.0uimaFIT
> Reporter: Peter Klügl
> Priority: Major
>
> Using SimplePipeline with JCas cover classes and Ruta leads currently to
> class loader switching for each annotator since the JCas and the annotator
> refer to a different uima class loader due to the resource managers.
> Additionally, Ruta needs to perform internal reindexing, which can lead to
> observed but undefined problems.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
