Yes, I only see 2.10.3 on our official update site.
For Ruta: I will update the update site for RC1 Peter Am 28.01.2019 um 15:51 schrieb Marshall Schor: > Hi Peter, > > Re: the Uima V2: > > Here's the intent: > To have 2.10.2 and 2.10.3 on our official update site. > To have the older versions here: > > http://archive.apache.org/dist/uima/archive-eclipse-update-site/uimaj-2.3.1-2.10.1/ > > I did a quick look at the official one, and see 2 releases (2.10.2 and > 2.10.3); > > What did you observe when testing? Did the update site not have 2.10.2 when > actually used? > > -Marshall > > On 1/28/2019 4:07 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: >> Ah ok. >> >> >> Yes, this was not intentional. >> >> >> I thought that the condition did work even if the property is missing >> since the build downloaded the old bundles. So, I thought the default is >> 'false'. >> >> >> How should we proceed? >> >> >> I can build a new update site with the same staged artifacts since the >> update site build is still a separate/manual step in the release process. >> >> I could also do a new RC2. >> >> Or we proceed and accept that the older versions are missing. For me, >> this is not a problem. in my opinion, the users should install the >> latest version anyway. And we could fix this for the next release. >> >> >> Btw, when I was testing this, I observed the same issue for the uimaj v2 >> bundles in our official update site. >> >> >> Best, >> >> >> Peter >> >> >> >> Am 25.01.2019 um 20:05 schrieb Marshall Schor: >>> to see this, uncheck the "Show only the latest versions of available >>> software". >>> >>> For the www.apache.org/dist/uima/eclipse-update-site/ruta, you see versions >>> >>> 2.1.0, 2.2.0, 2.2.1, 2.3.0, 2.3.1, 2.4.0, 2.5.0, 2.6.0, 2.6.1 >>> >>> for the new update site, only 2.7.0 >>> >>> This isn't necessarily a bad thing, see >>> https://uima.apache.org/dev-eclipse-plugin-archiving. >>> >>> But it seems it wasn't intentional. >>> What has gone wrong is that the update site build pom needs to add a >>> property: >>> <dropPrevVersions>false</dropPrevVersions> >>> >>> If not specified, it is defaulting to true in the pom test on line 154 in >>> the >>> eclipse-update-site's pom.xml. >>> >>> -Marshall >>> >>> On 1/25/2019 1:50 PM, Peter Klügl wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> >>>> this should not have changed. I see 2.1.0 and later bundles for the staged >>>> update site: >>>> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.7.0-rc1/eclipse-update-site/ruta/features/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I have not checked if it is possible install older version during my >>>> review. >>>> >>>> What do you mean exactly? The update process in Eclispe? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> >>>> Peter >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 25.01.2019 um 19:46 schrieb Marshall Schor: >>>>> The eclipse update site no longer has any previous release versions of the >>>>> plugins. >>>>> >>>>> Is this intentional? >>>>> >>>>> -Marshall >>>>> -- Dr. Peter Klügl R&D Text Mining/Machine Learning Averbis GmbH Tennenbacher Str. 11 79106 Freiburg Germany Fon: +49 761 708 394 0 Fax: +49 761 708 394 10 Email: [email protected] Web: https://averbis.com Headquarters: Freiburg im Breisgau Register Court: Amtsgericht Freiburg im Breisgau, HRB 701080 Managing Directors: Dr. med. Philipp Daumke, Dr. Kornél Markó
