[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17014163#comment-17014163
]
Richard Eckart de Castilho commented on UIMA-5936:
--------------------------------------------------
Question: How should we handle the parameters on the PearSpecifier class? The
naive approach would be to have two pairs of parameter getter/setter methods:
* get/setParameters (legacy) - only supporting string values
* get/setPearParameters (new) - supports arbitrary values
If we do this, I wonder whether getPearParameters should also return the
parameter values set via the legacy approach...
> PearSpecifier should be able to store every parametertype that
> analysisEngines support
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: UIMA-5936
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5936
> Project: UIMA
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 2.10.3SDK
> Reporter: Matthias Koch
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: UIMA-5936.diff
>
> Time Spent: 40m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The pearSpecifier currently holds a Parameter_impl(String, String). This
> limits the fields of application. Therefore we changed the specifier to store
> an array of nameValuePairs, so all possible analysisEngine parameters are
> supported.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
