[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17080446#comment-17080446
 ] 

Richard Eckart de Castilho commented on UIMA-6214:
--------------------------------------------------

The actual changes made differ slightly from the proposal above - in particular 
there are two kinds of {{bindResourcesOnce}} - one with and one without binding 
of nested resources. The ones without nested resources have been renamed to 
{{bindResourcesOnceWithoutNested}}.

Also, another {{bindResources}} call taking a URL as the last argument was 
deprecated and renamed to {{bindResourcesUsingUrl}}.

The migration section of the documentation describes the changes in detail.

> Method signature clash in ExternalResourceFactory
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: UIMA-6214
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6214
>             Project: UIMA
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: uimaFIT
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0uimaFIT
>            Reporter: Richard Eckart de Castilho
>            Assignee: Richard Eckart de Castilho
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.1.0uimaFIT
>
>
> The renaming of methods in the ExternalResourceFactory between uimaFIT v2 and 
> v3 was designed to remove ambiguities between the method signatures. However, 
> it has introduced a new set of ambiguities...
> There are a few methods meant do bind a resource to one particular thing 
> (resource manager, component, other resource)
> * {{void bindResource(ResourceCreationSpecifier aDesc, String aBindTo, 
> ExternalResourceDescription aRes)}}
> * {{void bindResource(ResourceCreationSpecifier aDesc, String aBindTo, String 
> aRes)}}
> * {{void bindResource(ResourceManagerConfiguration aResMgrCfg, String 
> aBindTo, String aRes)}}
> * {{void bindResource(ExternalResourceDescription aRes, String aBindTo, 
> ExternalResourceDescription aNestedRes)}}
> * {{void bindResource(ResourceManagerConfiguration aResMgrCfg, String 
> aBindTo, ExternalResourceDescription aRes)}}
> Then, there is another bunch of methods meant to scan objects recursively and 
> bind resources wherever applicable:
> * {{void bindResource(ResourceSpecifier aDesc, String aKey, 
> ExternalResourceDescription aResDesc)}}
> * {{void bindResource(ResourceSpecifier aDesc, String aKey, String aUrl)}}
> * {{void bindResource(ResourceSpecifier aDesc, Class<? extends Resource> 
> aRes, String... aParams)}}
> * {{void bindResource(ResourceSpecifier aDesc, Class<?> aApi, Class<? extends 
> Resource> aRes, String... aParams)}}
> * {{void bindResource(ResourceSpecifier aDesc, ExternalResourceDescription 
> aResDesc)}}
> * {{void bindResource(ResourceSpecifier aDesc, String aKey, Class<? extends 
> Resource> aRes, String... aParams)}}
> * {{void bindResource(ResourceSpecifier aDesc, String aKey, File aFile)}}
> * {{void bindResource(ResourceSpecifier aDesc, String aKey, URL aUrl)}}
> * {{void bindResourceUsingUrl(ResourceSpecifier aDesc, Class<? extends 
> SharedResourceObject> aRes, String aUrl, Object... aParams)}}
> * {{void bindResourceUsingUrl(ResourceSpecifier aDesc, Class<?> aApi, Class<? 
> extends SharedResourceObject> aRes, String aUrl, Object... aParams)}}
> * {{void bindResourceUsingUrl(ResourceSpecifier aDesc, String aKey, Class<? 
> extends SharedResourceObject> aRes, String aUrl, Object... aParams)}}
> There is in particular a conflict between these pairs because 
> {{ResourceCreationSpecifier}} is a subclass of {{ResourceSpecifier}}
> *Pair 1*
> * bind specifically: {{void bindResource(ResourceCreationSpecifier aDesc, 
> String aBindTo, ExternalResourceDescription aRes)}}
> * scan recursively: {{void bindResource(ResourceSpecifier aDesc, String aKey, 
> ExternalResourceDescription aResDesc)}}
> *Pair 2*
> * bind specifically: {{void bindResource(ResourceCreationSpecifier aDesc, 
> String aBindTo, String aRes)}}
> * scan recursively: {{void bindResource(ResourceSpecifier aDesc, String aKey, 
> String aUrl)}}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to