Marshall, if there is an established convention for naming projects uima-as needs to conform for consistency.
I will review the instructions and proceed with uima-uimaas -jerry On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 5:53 PM Marshall Schor <m...@schor.com> wrote: > The current info on this is mainly in the Jira issue: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19750 > > > Some comments: > > The existing git repo is incorrectly named (IMHO), because it doesn't > follow the > conventions for all the others. > > So, I think we can go ahead with creating a new git repository with the > name > something like uima-uimaas, without waiting for infra to delete the old > one. > > Also I noticed that the referenced code for doing the migration said > something > where it did the renaming of "trunk" to "master" etc. > > Probably worth a careful read :-) ; maybe our renaming of this ahead of > time is > not right. > > > -Marshall > >
