no, you are correct, I am mistaken (about the license).  A (hopefully) temporary
confusion :-).

At some point, it might make sense to converge on just a single xmlunit 
provider. 

-Marshall

On 4/25/2020 3:19 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
> On 25. Apr 2020, at 21:16, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote:
>> It looks like it has a license (a BSD form) which I think might require 
>> updating
>> all the licenses / (maybe notices) for both source and binary distr.
> In the source distribution, AFAIK we do not (have to) mention the licenses of 
> dependencies.
>
> Since it is a build dependency that is not (should not be) included in the 
> binary distribution, it also shouldn't be necessary to include it there.
>
> Am I mistaken?
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Richard

Reply via email to