[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard Eckart de Castilho updated UIMA-6285:
---------------------------------------------
Description:
select.following() on a zero-width annotation returns other zero-width
annotation at same location. The following test fails:
{code}
@Test
public void
thatSelectFollowingDoesNotFindOtherZeroWidthAnnotationAtSameLocation()
{
Annotation a1 = cas.createAnnotation(cas.getAnnotationType(), 10, 10);
Annotation a2 = cas.createAnnotation(cas.getAnnotationType(), 10, 10);
asList(a1, a2).forEach(cas::addFsToIndexes);
List<Annotation> selection = cas.select(Annotation.class)
.following(a1)
.asList();
assertThat(selection)
.isEmpty();
}
{code}
In this case, {{a2}} should not be considered as "following" {{a1}} - it is not
following, it is at the very same location.
Strictly speaking, the code does what the documentation of following says:
{quote}
For AnnotationIndex, position to first Annotation whose {{begin <=
fs.getEnd()}};
{quote}
In this case, {{a2.getBegin() == fs.getEnd()}}. However, I believe it is an
edge-case that was not considered when the documentation was written and the
intended behavior should be that annotations that are at exactly the same
position should never be considered to be following or preceding each other.
was:
select.following() on a zero-width annotation returns other zero-width
annotation at same location. The following test fails:
{code}
@Test
public void
thatSelectFollowingDoesNotFindOtherZeroWidthAnnotationAtSameLocation()
{
Annotation a1 = cas.createAnnotation(cas.getAnnotationType(), 10, 10);
Annotation a2 = cas.createAnnotation(cas.getAnnotationType(), 10, 10);
asList(a1, a2).forEach(cas::addFsToIndexes);
List<Annotation> selection = cas.select(Annotation.class)
.following(a1)
.asList();
assertThat(selection)
.isEmpty();
}
{code}
In this case, {{a2}} should not be considered as "following" {{a1}} - it is not
following, it is at the very same location.
> select.following() on a zero-width annotation returns other zero-width
> annotation at same location
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: UIMA-6285
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6285
> Project: UIMA
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Affects Versions: 3.1.1SDK
> Reporter: Richard Eckart de Castilho
> Assignee: Richard Eckart de Castilho
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.2.0SDK
>
>
> select.following() on a zero-width annotation returns other zero-width
> annotation at same location. The following test fails:
> {code}
> @Test
> public void
> thatSelectFollowingDoesNotFindOtherZeroWidthAnnotationAtSameLocation()
> {
> Annotation a1 = cas.createAnnotation(cas.getAnnotationType(), 10, 10);
> Annotation a2 = cas.createAnnotation(cas.getAnnotationType(), 10, 10);
>
> asList(a1, a2).forEach(cas::addFsToIndexes);
>
> List<Annotation> selection = cas.select(Annotation.class)
> .following(a1)
> .asList();
>
> assertThat(selection)
> .isEmpty();
> }
> {code}
> In this case, {{a2}} should not be considered as "following" {{a1}} - it is
> not following, it is at the very same location.
> Strictly speaking, the code does what the documentation of following says:
> {quote}
> For AnnotationIndex, position to first Annotation whose {{begin <=
> fs.getEnd()}};
> {quote}
> In this case, {{a2.getBegin() == fs.getEnd()}}. However, I believe it is an
> edge-case that was not considered when the documentation was written and the
> intended behavior should be that annotations that are at exactly the same
> position should never be considered to be following or preceding each other.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
