Hi,
first of all, thanks for voting. Yes, the status of the example projects is still undefined, an open issue. I personally tend to remove them all, or at least to separate them from the main reactor and release cycle. The warning indicates that the type system description is not up to date. Not a problem, and it will also not influence any functionality, just a warning. Best, Peter Am 17.05.2021 um 12:16 schrieb Richard Eckart de Castilho: > Checked ZIP vs TAG: ok > Checked build against Java 16: ok > Spot-check signature on Maven artifact: ok > Signature check on source zip: ok > Issues fixed list: looks good > License/Notice: ok > Installed Update Site into Eclipse 2021-03 (after installing UIMA 3.2.0 > plugins): ok > Importing "Existing projects" from source ZIP: ok > - Note: "Misc" project comes up with an error "Misc is missing required > source folder 'resources'. This could > probably be avoided by adding an empty `.gitignore` file into the folder > > [x] +1 OK to release > > ---- > > I think I mentioned this in previous reviews: having a README.md file in the > example projects would be nice so > as a reviewer, I can quickly look at the file and know how to run the example > and what to expect from it. I have > literally no idea what to do with the example at this point and only the > "ExampleProject" contains a "Main.ruta" > which looks like something that I could run and it should probably "just > work". But when I run it, I only get a > message... > > ``` > [main] WARN org.apache.uima - JCAS class > "org.apache.uima.ruta.type.EvalAnnotation" defines a UIMA field "group" but > the UIMA type doesn't define that field. > ``` > > ... and I still have no idea if it worked and where to look for results and > what these results should be. Maybe > the script could just log something like "Run successful. Processed XXX of > YYY expected annotations. Look for results in ZZZ"? And in the README file, > it could also say what to do in order to look at the actual output files. > > Well, I assumed it ran and did what it should since I only got a "WARN" and > not an "ERROR" - but did it? No idea. > > Cheers, > > -- Richard > >> On 12. May 2021, at 17:09, Peter Klügl <peter.klu...@averbis.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> the Apache UIMA Ruta 3.1.0 RC2 has been staged. >> >> This is a feature release also including a whole bunch of bugfixes. >> >> Changes since RC1: >> - updated versions >> - updated LICENSE/NOTICE in Eclipse plugin >> >> >> Issues: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.1.0ruta >> Dist. artifacts: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uima-ruta-3.1.0-rc2 >> Maven staging repo: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1264/ >> GitHub tag: >> https://github.com/apache/uima-ruta/tree/ruta-3.1.0 >> Update Site: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uima-ruta-3.1.0-rc2/eclipse-update-site-v3/ruta >> >> Please vote on release: >> >> [ ] +1 OK to release >> [ ] 0 Don't care >> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ... >> >> Thanks. >> >> -- Peter -- Dr. Peter Klügl Head of Text Mining/Machine Learning Averbis GmbH Salzstr. 15 79098 Freiburg Germany Fon: +49 761 708 394 0 Fax: +49 761 708 394 10 Email: peter.klu...@averbis.com Web: https://averbis.com Headquarters: Freiburg im Breisgau Register Court: Amtsgericht Freiburg im Breisgau, HRB 701080 Managing Directors: Dr. med. Philipp Daumke, Dr. Kornél Markó
