[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17519425#comment-17519425
]
Richard Eckart de Castilho commented on UIMA-6265:
--------------------------------------------------
For the record: the way that UIMA figures out that a {{SOAP}} (or {{Vinci}}
protocol in an {{URISpecifier}} is handled correctly, it seems the way this is
set up is via the {{factoryConfig.xml}} file:
{noformat}
<simpleFactory specifier="org.apache.uima.resource.ResourceSpecifier">
<binding specifier="org.apache.uima.resource.URISpecifier"
resource="org.apache.uima.adapter.vinci.VinciAnalysisEngineServiceAdapter"/>
<binding specifier="org.apache.uima.resource.URISpecifier"
resource="org.apache.uima.adapter.soap.SoapAnalysisEngineServiceAdapter"/>
...
{noformat}
> Drop SOAP support from UIMAv3
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: UIMA-6265
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6265
> Project: UIMA
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Transport Adapters - SOAP, Vinci
> Reporter: Richard Eckart de Castilho
> Assignee: Richard Eckart de Castilho
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0SDK
>
>
> Does anybody know if we still need JVinci and SOAP these days?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
