[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard Eckart de Castilho updated UIMA-6446:
---------------------------------------------
Component/s: uimaFIT
> Complexities around enhancing classes with their resource name
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: UIMA-6446
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6446
> Project: UIMA
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: uimaFIT, uimaFIT-Maven-Plugin
> Reporter: Richard Eckart de Castilho
> Assignee: Richard Eckart de Castilho
> Priority: Major
>
> The uimaFIT Maven Plugin contains a mojo called {{enhance}}. This mojo adds a
> {{ResourceMetaData}} annotation to every class that does not already have one.
> In that case, it also sets the {{name}} field using the resource class name.
> Now consider the following scenario:
> * component class {{Child}} inherits from (abstract) component class
> {{Parent}}
> * for some reason, the class {{Parent}} has been enhanced and therefore
> carries an auto-generated {{ResourceMetaData("Parent")}} annotation
> * for some reason, the class {{Child}} has not been enhanced and also does
> not carry a {{ResourceMetaData}} annotation
> When generating a descriptor for the component now, e.g. using
> {{createEngineDescription(Child.class}}, the name of the resulting component
> will be {{Parent}}.
> It would seem the approach to solve this problem is to only consider the
> {{ResourceMetaData.name}} field when it is defined directly on a component.
> However, for the other fields like {{copyright, description, vendor,
> version}} it would likewise seem problematic to look them up in parent
> classes. In many cases, the parent and the child will be in the same project
> - but in many other cases, they may also not be.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)
