On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 1:55 PM Richard Eckart de Castilho <r...@apache.org>
wrote:

>
> There would also be an alternative to using DockerHub, namely using GitHub:
>
>
> https://docs.github.com/en/packages/working-with-a-github-packages-registry/working-with-the-container-registry
>
> I recently moved some of my (non-Apache) projects there when DockerHub
> threatened
> to change their open source hosting model ... which they rolled back again
> after
> a few days since the community didn't like it at all ... at that point I
> was already gone.
>
> Do you have an opinion regarding DockerHub vs GitHub container registry?
>

Over the Christmas break I learned to use GitHub Actions and it really
simplifies workflows. I'm now much more inclined to use the GitHub
container registry.

My only concern is whether it has some traffic limits but that's most
probably different for Apache Foundation accounts.



> I can also see in the GitHub web UI that there have been commits comming
> into the UIMA-CPP repo - I do watch it for all activity, but for some
> reason
> I cannot remember having seen any issue mails. Are you committing
> all your changes directly to main?
>

Well, originally I was working on my own fork. I was a little confused when
you suggested I moved the work to the main repo. Now I understand what you
had in mind.


> It would be good to open issues and corresponding pull requests for those
> issues - those generate useful mails. Cf.
> https://github.com/apache/uima-uimaj
> There area also useful templates here:
>
>   https://github.com/apache/uima-uimaj/tree/main/.github
>

Lovely!

I will be issuing tickets for the different improvements I'm tackling:

* Update documentation
* Separate Python annotator from Python extension
* Respect multi threading flag for Python
* Install as system level Python package using Debian
* Install UIMA as system level using Debian
* Write GH actions to produce docker image
* Publish docker image to GitHub registry

I'm putting it here first for discussion in case anybody has any feedback.
I'm particularly interested in whether the granularity makes sense.

Best regards,

P










>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Richard
>
>

Reply via email to