Hi, - checked sigs and hashes: *OK* - built from sources: *OK* - spot check issues fixed report: *OK* - spot check release notes and readme: *OK* - - broken Full Changelog link and outdated README info, e.g. "*We use Maven 3.8.1 3.9.9 and Java 17 or later for building*" (not a blocker) - installed and tested in Eclipse 2024-03: *OK* - - tested Query & Explain Views: *OK*
[x] +1 OK to release Best, Viorel On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 2:11 PM Richard Eckart de Castilho <r...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > > the Apache UIMA Ruta 3.5.0 RC 2 has been staged. > > This is a feature and bugfix release. > > This version requires at least Java 17 and Maven 3.8.1 to build. > Eclipse plugins can be installed into Eclipse 2023-09 or later. > > ## Changes vs RC 1 > * Changed the version of UIMA in the Ruta feature from 3.5.0 to 3.6.0 > * Added Maven Enforcer plugin because the project won't build with Maven > 3.8 > * Added two issues to the release notes that were hidden in another PR > > ## What's Changed > * ⭐️ Issue #170: Type based annotation assignments should only add visible > annotations > * ⭐️ Issue #171: Support implicit FSArray assigments with FeatureStructures > * ⭐️ Issue #177: Consider resource manager when loading type descriptions > * 🦟 Issue #169: Annotation assignment not working correctly > * 🦟 Issue #173: Potential memory leak in Annotation Browser View > * ⚙️ Issue #179: Remove toolchains > * ⚙️ Issue #176: Upgrade dependencies > > Issues: > https://github.com/apache/uima-ruta/issues?q=milestone%3A3.5.0 > Dist. artifacts: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-3.5.0-RC-202411291300-070de3f/ > Eclipse Update Site: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-3.5.0-RC-202411291300-070de3f/eclipse-update-site/ > Maven staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1310 > GitHub tag: https://github.com/apache/uima-ruta/tree/ruta-3.5.0 > Git commit: 070de3fc4bd91861532db75b81476534efc2c195 > > Please vote on release: > > [ ] +1 OK to release > [ ] 0 Don't care > [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ... > > Thanks. > > -- Richard > >
