[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UNOMI-250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Serge Huber updated UNOMI-250:
------------------------------
    Description: 
Right now we have a bit of a mess in our services implementation sub-project. 
All the service implementations are in the package:
  org.apache.unomi.services.services

I propose that we rename this package to:
  org.apache.unomi.services.impl
and that each service gets its own sub-package, for example the 
RulesServiceImpl would be in:
  org.apache.unomi.services.impl.rules

This would make it much easier to activate/deactivate logging per service 
implementation, because currently it is tricky to get logging activated 
properly unless using configuration by class. Having it by package would be a 
lot better. 

Utility classes such as ThirdPartyService or the clustering event classes would 
also be moved with the service sub-package they belong to.

In terms of impact this should minimal, only people activating logs should be 
notified that the class location has changed.


  was:
Right now we have a bit of a mess in our services implementation sub-project. 
All the service implementations are in the package:
  org.apache.unomi.services.services

I propose that we rename this package to:
  org.apache.unomi.services.impl
and that each service gets its own sub-package, for example the 
RulesServiceImpl would be in:
  org.apache.unomi.services.impl.rules

This would make it much easier to activate/deactivate logging per service 
implementation, because currently it is tricky to get logging activated 
properly unless using configuration by class. Having it by package would be a 
lot better. 

Utility classes such as ThirdPartyService or the clustering event classes would 
also be moved with the service sub-package they belong to.



> Refactor services implementations into separate packages
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: UNOMI-250
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UNOMI-250
>             Project: Apache Unomi
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 1.4.0, 1.5.0
>            Reporter: Serge Huber
>            Assignee: Serge Huber
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.5.0
>
>
> Right now we have a bit of a mess in our services implementation sub-project. 
> All the service implementations are in the package:
>   org.apache.unomi.services.services
> I propose that we rename this package to:
>   org.apache.unomi.services.impl
> and that each service gets its own sub-package, for example the 
> RulesServiceImpl would be in:
>   org.apache.unomi.services.impl.rules
> This would make it much easier to activate/deactivate logging per service 
> implementation, because currently it is tricky to get logging activated 
> properly unless using configuration by class. Having it by package would be a 
> lot better. 
> Utility classes such as ThirdPartyService or the clustering event classes 
> would also be moved with the service sub-package they belong to.
> In terms of impact this should minimal, only people activating logs should be 
> notified that the class location has changed.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to