Done from my side. 

cheers,  
  Serge… 

> On 20 sept. 2016, at 10:29, Thomas Draier <tdra...@jahia.com> wrote:
> 
> Ok,
> 
> If everybody's ok for the release, I'll start the process asap. Can you
> please review all resolved tickets you opened and close them if it's ok ?
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UNOMI%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20AND%20reporter%20in%20(currentUser())
> 
> thanks,
> 
> thomas
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:29 PM Thomas Draier <tdra...@jahia.com> wrote:
> 
>> We could probably go for a 2.0 when we upgrade ES and karaf . And yes, a
>> possibility to use a non-embedded ES would be nice, but then we'll have to
>> handle the cluster by ourself (which should not be a big deal).
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:20 PM Serge Huber <shu...@jahia.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1 for release
>>> 
>>> +1 for Abdelkader
>>> 
>>> +1 for Damien
>>> 
>>> After the release it would be great if we could merge my pull request to
>>> upgrade to ElasticSearch 2.4.0. I’ve been testing it more and more and it
>>> seems functional from my side. We should also upgrade to Karaf 4 once JB
>>> has time to send us his modifications :)
>>> 
>>> After that there are more things I’d like to improve (such as making it
>>> possible to use a non-embedded ElasticSearch) but I think that’s a topic
>>> for another mail :)
>>> 
>>> cheers,
>>>  Serge…
>>> 
>>>> On 14 sept. 2016, at 14:53, Thomas Draier <tdra...@jahia.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi there,
>>>> 
>>>> What would you think of starting a release 1.1.0 ? There have been a
>>> lot of
>>>> bug fixes, and some improvements on the API (privacy, user profile,
>>> ability
>>>> to post conditions, ..), and also a long time since the last release.
>>>> 
>>>> And also, I would like to propose Abdelkader Midani and Damien Gaillard
>>> as
>>>> committers . Abdelakader already did  a lot of fixes, and Damien
>>> started to
>>>> contribute just one month ago but already did some interesting patches
>>> too.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards
>>>> 
>>>> thomas
>>> 
>>> 

Reply via email to