[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/USERGRID-103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13946674#comment-13946674
]
Rod Simpson commented on USERGRID-103:
--------------------------------------
+1 on going to 2.0 instead of master
--
Rod Simpson
@rockerston
rodsimpson.com
On March 25, 2014 at 9:19:47 AM, David Johnson (JIRA) ([email protected]) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/USERGRID-103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13946661#comment-13946661
]
David Johnson commented on USERGRID-103:
----------------------------------------
I'm still working on getting my build to work, and reviewing the code.
One issue I would like to discuss is, where should we merge this change? I
think the extensive code changes and could be destabilizing and would prefer to
see the Usergrid master stay pretty stable, something we can release real soon.
I would vote for merging this code into the two-dot-o branch instead.
Thoughts?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
> Upgrade to JAX-RS 2.0 (jersey 2.x)
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: USERGRID-103
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/USERGRID-103
> Project: Usergrid
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Stack
> Reporter: Strong Liu
>
> JAX-RS 2.0 brings lots of new features, much better extensible and async
> support are ones I think most useful
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)