[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/USERGRID-103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13946674#comment-13946674
 ] 

Rod Simpson commented on USERGRID-103:
--------------------------------------

+1 on going to 2.0 instead of master



-- 
Rod Simpson
@rockerston
rodsimpson.com

On March 25, 2014 at 9:19:47 AM, David Johnson (JIRA) ([email protected]) wrote:


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/USERGRID-103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13946661#comment-13946661
 ]  

David Johnson commented on USERGRID-103:  
----------------------------------------  

I'm still working on getting my build to work, and reviewing the code.  

One issue I would like to discuss is, where should we merge this change? I 
think the extensive code changes and could be destabilizing and would prefer to 
see the Usergrid master stay pretty stable, something we can release real soon. 
I would vote for merging this code into the two-dot-o branch instead.  

Thoughts?  






--  
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA  
(v6.2#6252)  


> Upgrade to JAX-RS 2.0 (jersey 2.x)
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: USERGRID-103
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/USERGRID-103
>             Project: Usergrid
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Stack
>            Reporter: Strong Liu
>
> JAX-RS 2.0 brings lots of new features, much better extensible and async 
> support are ones I think most useful 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to