Hate to continue the train...

Can you please review the license of MD5 w/ legal?
https://www.npmjs.com/package/MD5

In addition, intro.js seems to be a MIT license but is not called as such
https://github.com/usablica/intro.js

Things you may want to list in your notice file.

John

On Tue Dec 16 2014 at 11:48:38 AM Shawn Feldman <[email protected]>
wrote:

> it was a reference in the gruntfile. no code was in our repo
>
> On Tue Dec 16 2014 at 9:46:40 AM Rod Simpson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Huh, I thought we had gotten rid of all the highcharts code.
>>
>> --
>> Rod Simpson
>> T @rockerston
>> W rodsimpson.com
>>
>> On December 16, 2014 at 9:43:11 AM, John D. Ament ([email protected])
>> wrote:
>>
>> My UI guy just started flailing his arms about complaining about build
>> tools consistency when i asked him about this. :-)
>>
>> Thanks guys.
>>
>> On Tue Dec 16 2014 at 11:07:15 AM Shawn Feldman <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > the pr will remove that. we must have cleaned it up a while ago and
>> forgot
>> > about that line.
>> >
>> > On Tue Dec 16 2014 at 9:03:33 AM John D. Ament <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Yeah that's weird. I guess grunt doesn't complain about missing files
>> if
>> > > they're not used?
>> > >
>> > > On Tue Dec 16 2014 at 11:02:30 AM Shawn Feldman <
>> [email protected]
>> > >
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-usergrid/pull/124
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue Dec 16 2014 at 8:57:33 AM Shawn Feldman <
>> > [email protected]>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > here is the only reference i can find
>> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-usergrid/blob/
>> > > > master/portal/Gruntfile.js#L78
>> > > > >
>> > > > > we can just remove that line
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Tue Dec 16 2014 at 8:56:40 AM Shawn Feldman <
>> > > [email protected]>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> John do you see the file? all i can see is one line in the grunt
>> > > file.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> On Tue Dec 16 2014 at 8:53:45 AM John D. Ament <
>> > [email protected]
>> > > >
>> > > > >> wrote:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>> From my point of view, you cannot create an apache release w/
>> this
>> > > lib
>> > > > in
>> > > > >>> here. This was missed in the 1.0.0 release but that should not
>> > have
>> > > > been
>> > > > >>> releasable.
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> On Tue Dec 16 2014 at 10:50:57 AM Shawn Feldman <
>> > > > [email protected]
>> > > > >>> >
>> > > > >>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> > i think we need to remove the lib, then remove the chart on
>> the
>> > > > >>> application
>> > > > >>> > home page, then verify the tests pass
>> > > > >>> >
>> > > > >>> > On Tue Dec 16 2014 at 8:48:14 AM Dave Johnson <
>> > [email protected]
>> > > >
>> > > > >>> wrote:
>> > > > >>> >
>> > > > >>> > > We should definitely remove it and as soon as we can. I’d
>> like
>> > to
>> > > > >>> get an
>> > > > >>> > > RC out for 1.0.1 today if possible.
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > >>> > > What needs to be done to remove it?
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > >>> > > - Dave
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > >>> > > > On Dec 16, 2014, at 10:30 AM, Shawn Feldman <
>> > > > >>> [email protected]>
>> > > > >>> > > wrote:
>> > > > >>> > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > We should probably remove it. It was used in our
>> proprietary
>> > > > >>> codebase
>> > > > >>> > > and I
>> > > > >>> > > > think only serves one chart on the application page
>> > > > >>> > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014, 7:11 AM John D. Ament <
>> > > > [email protected]
>> > > > >>> >
>> > > > >>> > > wrote:
>> > > > >>> > > >
>> > > > >>> > > >> Hi,
>> > > > >>> > > >>
>> > > > >>> > > >> In the portal app, there's a dependency on Highcharts
>> 2.3.5.
>> > > As
>> > > > >>> best
>> > > > >>> > > as I
>> > > > >>> > > >> can tell, this is a commercial license.
>> > > > >>> http://www.highcharts.com/
>> > > > >>> > > >>
>> > > > >>> > > >> Can you confirm this?
>> > > > >>> > > >>
>> > > > >>> > > >> John
>> > > > >>> > > >>
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > >>> >
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to