That makes sense.  I have added a 2.4.1 version to Jira and created this
issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VCL-836

The fix has been committed to trunk.

-Andy



On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Aaron Coburn <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think that, since the vote for 2.4 has already concluded and the
> artifacts have been published to the apache.org mirrors, we would need to
> cut a 2.4.1 release.
>
> -Aaron Coburn
>
>
> > On Mar 17, 2015, at 9:05 PM, Andy Kurth <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry for not sending this earlier.  Aaron P. and I identified a problem
> > today affecting cluster reservations when DHCP is used for public IP
> > addresses.  The IP addresses in the cluster_info file added to each node
> > may be wrong.  Essentially, vcld is caching some information to lessen
> the
> > load on the database.  As a result, an old IP address may be saved in the
> > cluster_info file and scripts an image creator saved in a cluster image
> > will certainly fail.  The fix to the backend code is trivial.
> >
> > Because this problem would cause unpredictable results for end users and
> > may cause certain cluster environments to be unusable, I would advise
> > against using 2.4 RC3 without modifying the code.  How should we handle
> > this?  I could be mistaken, but I am not aware of any hard-set rules
> > compelling us to release a version after a voting period ended if a known
> > problem is identified before the general public can obtain the release.
> > Unless there is a policy standing in the way, I propose creating RC4
> > tomorrow morning and closing a vote Monday 3/23 at the same time of day
> the
> > candidate is created.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Andy
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Josh Thompson <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> Based on the following votes, the Apache VCL community has voted to
> release
> >> Apache VCL 2.4:
> >>
> >> Josh Thompson (PMC member)
> >> Dmitri Chebotarov (PMC member)
> >> Alexander Patterson
> >> Aaron Coburn (PMC member)
> >> Andy Kurth (PMC chair)
> >> Aaron Peeler (PMC member)
> >>
> >> That's +5 from PMC members and another +1 from the community.  There
> were
> >> no 0
> >> or -1 votes.  That gives a total of 6 to pass the vote.
> >>
> >> I'll go ahead and create the release artifact and publish it to our
> >> distribution location. I'll give it around 24 hours for all of the
> mirrors
> >> to
> >> pick it up and then send out an [ANNOUNCE] message.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Josh
> >>
> >> On Friday, March 13, 2015 4:11:56 PM you wrote:
> >>> The issues identified in RC2 plus a few minor items have been fixed.
> >> RC3 is
> >>> now available for testing and voting upon.  Again, basically the same
> >> email
> >>> with the voting deadline changed.
> >>>
> >>> As Andy mentioned in his reply to the "release nearly ready" thread,
> all
> >> of
> >>> the (non-documentation) JIRA issues associated with 2.4 are now
> resolved.
> >>> Here is our first try at voting to release 2.4.
> >>>
> >>> I created a release artifact based off of trunk.  I copied that branch
> >> to a
> >>> tag under the tags area of the repo that is named release-2.4-RC3:
> >>>
> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/vcl/tags/release-2.4-RC3/
> >>>
> >>> The artifact is an export from that tag with the addition of Dojo
> Toolkit
> >>> version 1.6.2 with a custom VCL profile and Spyc both bundled in the
> web
> >>> code. The artifact, MD5 and SHA1 sums, and my GPG signature of it are
> >>> available from my space on people.a.o:
> >>>
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~jfthomps/apache-VCL-2.4-RC3/
> >>>
> >>> The list of resolved JIRA issues associated with this release can be
> >> found
> >>> under 2.4 on the Change Log page in the staging area of the CMS:
> >>>
> >>> http://vcl.staging.apache.org/docs/changelog.html
> >>>
> >>> This is the first release to include an installation script.
> >> Installation
> >>> instructions on using the script and doing things manually are on the
> >>> following page in the staging area of the CMS:
> >>>
> >>> http://vcl.staging.apache.org/docs/VCL24InstallGuide.html
> >>>
> >>> The INSTALLATION file in the release artifact only contains information
> >> on
> >>> using the script.
> >>>
> >>> *NOTE* To use the installation script with RC3, you need to give it the
> >>> --rc=1 option (which is not included in the output of --help).
> >>>
> >>> I was able to successfully do test installs and upgrades, including
> image
> >>> deploying and capture.
> >>>
> >>> The directory created by extracting the RC3 artifact is
> >> "apache-VCL-2.4-RC3"
> >>> (after extracting, you may want to rename it to "apache-VCL-2.4" if you
> >>> want to test the manual instruction from the online installation
> guide).
> >>> Licensing information about perl and its required modules, php and its
> >>> required modules, and mysql are stated as "system requirements"
> according
> >>> to the information under "System Requirements" on
> >>> http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html.
> >>>
> >>> After we finalize a release vote, the staging part of the CMS will be
> >>> published to update the production site.
> >>>
> >>> Please vote by 5pm (EST) on Tuesday, March 17th to publish this
> release.
> >>> Everyone in the community is encouraged to vote if you have at least
> done
> >>> some testing.  However, only votes by members of the PMC are binding
> >> votes.
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 yes, release VCL 2.4
> >>> [ ] 0 dunno
> >>> [ ] -1 no, don't release VCL 2.4 (provide reasons if this is your vote)
> >> - --
> >> - -------------------------------
> >> Josh Thompson
> >> VCL Developer
> >> North Carolina State University
> >>
> >> my GPG/PGP key can be found at pgp.mit.edu
> >>
> >> All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which
> >> are sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public
> >> Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >> Version: GnuPG v2
> >>
> >> iEYEARECAAYFAlUIqywACgkQV/LQcNdtPQMqKACfVhK/zapJUkJu6K6snOAj9OB7
> >> j+0AnRlRcNHgUaznbz26+FauRV9+Z5M5
> >> =btE8
> >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>

Reply via email to