+1 for getting rid of this. On a related note, I'd like to eventually move away from the whole "server reservation" concept altogether. (I think I may have said this in the past in a thread or Jira issue.) A reservation is a reservation. They may have different attributes such as group access, indefinite end times, timeouts disabled, etc. The current design which makes a large distinction between server reservations and other reservations is messy and limiting.
-Andy On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Josh Thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I'm thinking of removing the Server Profiles section of the site as it > never > developed into much. I'm not talking about the Server Reservation > reservation > type, just the Server Profiles that can be applied to a Server Reservation. > Really, the only feature they add is being able to have a template of > settings > to apply when making a Server Reservation. > > Is anyone using Server Profiles? If I don't hear anything in the next > week or > so, I'll go ahead and start at least commenting them out. > > Thanks, > Josh > - -- > - ------------------------------- > Josh Thompson > VCL Developer > North Carolina State University > > my GPG/PGP key can be found at pgp.mit.edu > > All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which > are sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public > Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > iEYEARECAAYFAli3C3oACgkQV/LQcNdtPQNI7gCfVj6mOaZj4fdtsiNCNZysguoh > sNIAn1IWHYSdwX5D7Vui5Q1Io9XRhax3 > =m1em > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >
