On Jan 29, 2007, at 8:09 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
I believe the 1.6 was a typo. He was just suggesting that
velocity/engine/branches/Velocity_1.5_BRANCH
might be simply renamed
velocity/engine/branches/1.5
so that "velocity" and "branch" aren't repeated in the path. :)
yep - thanks for clarifying. The "1.6" was a typo.
geir
On 1/29/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Isn't that redundant "Velocity_1.6_BRANCH"?
>it's in the velocity project, in the branches directory... how
about
>"1.5"?
[...]
>> Added:
>> velocity/engine/branches/Velocity_1.5_BRANCH/
>> - copied from r500647, velocity/engine/trunk/
? Sorry I don't understand this mail. Please elaborate.
Best regards
Henning
--
Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | J2EE, Linux,
91054 Buckenhof, Germany -- +49 9131 506540 | Apache person
Open Source Consulting, Development, Design | Velocity - Turbine guy
"Save the cheerleader. Save the world."
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
