[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Nathan Bubna updated VELOCITY-606:
----------------------------------

    Attachment: VELOCITY-606-light.patch

Ok, this patch makes small improvements to makeMethodKey(), 
populateMethodCache(), and uses finer-grained locking in MethodCache.get/put.

However, as i did this, i realize there's a lot more that could be done.  
MethodCache.put and MethodMap.add involve synchronization but are all done 
being used internally upon initialization of a ClassMap instance and are not 
externally accessible.  It seems like ensuring ClassMap is not used until it is 
done being constructed would allow us to limit synchronization to 
MethodCache.get, and even that could probably be reduced to locking on a 
per-methodKey basis (similar to my patch for VELOCITY-595) if it turns out that 
MethodMap.find is where most time is spent.

> Velocity 1.5 performance bottlenecks
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: VELOCITY-606
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-606
>             Project: Velocity
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Engine
>    Affects Versions: 1.5
>         Environment: Win XP, 1 Gb, single core, Maven 2, JUnitPerf, JRat, 
> cached Velocity templates with a ClassLoader
>            Reporter: Jarkko Viinamäki
>         Attachments: velocity-1.5-250-threads-loadtest.PNG, 
> velocity-1.5-50-threads-loadtest.PNG, VELOCITY-606-light.patch
>
>
> I did some quite extensive profiling to identify performance bottlenecks in 
> Velocity 1.5.
> Using Maven 2, JUnitPerf and JRat I was able to identify these methods as top 
> bottlenecks:
> org.apache.velocity.util.introspection        ClassMap - 
> findMethod(String,Object[])
> org.apache.velocity.util.introspection        IntrospectorBase - 
> getMethod(Class,String,Object[])
> org.apache.velocity.runtime.parser.node       SimpleNode - literal()
> org.apache.velocity.runtime.parser.node       SimpleNode - 
> render(InternalContextAdapter,Writer)
> org.apache.commons.collections        ExtendedProperties - 
> getBoolean(String,boolean)
> org.apache.velocity.runtime.parser.node       ASTReference - 
> render(InternalContextAdapter,Writer)
> The first two eat over 50% of the CPU with many threads. See attached 
> screenshots.
> Interestingly enough the synchronized
> org.apache.velocity.runtime   RuntimeInstance getTemplate(String,String)
> isn't a big problem when templates are cached. However, if all resources are 
> not cached it becomes a serious performance bottleneck. ResourceCacheImpl 
> also uses a synchronized map which slows things down.
> I think these bottlenecks could be at least made less worse by reducing 
> synchronization by using ConcurrentHashMap and StringBuilder that ship with 
> JDK 1.5. I'm investigating what kind of benefits could be achieved with those.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to