+1 On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Nathan Bubna <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 from me > > On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Nathan Bubna <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ok, there were no complaints about the 2nd test build. Let's try the > > vote again... > > > > The build is still available here: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/2.0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Enbubna/velocity/tools/2.0/> > > > > Please vote regarding your support for releasing this new test build as > > VelocityTools 2.0: > > > > [ ] +1 Let's do it > > [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. > > [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you. > > [ ] -1 No, because __________________ > > > > If we have the necessary votes, i will close the vote Thursday (May > > 6), around 9am PST. If not, i'll start nagging, which is oh-so-fun. > > If this doesn't pass or get vetoed by two weeks from today, i'll close > > the vote anyway. Can't drag this out forever... > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Nathan Bubna <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Ok, i fixed the problem with the missing showcase war. Nothing else > >> has changed. I'll call for a new vote in a few days. Please test it > >> now, rather than before the vote starts. :) > >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/2.0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Enbubna/velocity/tools/2.0/> > >> > >> (based on revision 938119) > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
