Hi, I agree with Chris.
A code donation doesn’t mean necessary rewriting it. We can change packages, add the headers, etc, and it’s already a great first step. We can start with the existing headers and change step by step. Regards JB > Le 3 févr. 2021 à 16:15, Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> a écrit : > > But you don't have to rewrite the code. > > We could just use the existing code and just leave the original headers in > place. > There's nothing wrong with that. I double-checked with the VP of the > Incubator and he doesn't have any objections. > > Chris > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: jorge Arnulfo Quiané Ruiz <[email protected]> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. Februar 2021 12:34 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: Continuing ... > > Hello Chris, > > We do agree with you. We are now discussing to send a last recall to the > Qatar guys, if they do not react then we will proceed without them and > eventually rewrite the entire code. > > Best, > Jorge > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 9:41 AM Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> it's really unfortunate that the SGA process seems to be taking so long. >> I did mention the option you had when one/none of the previous >> companies didn't sign the SGA. I think we should continue that path. >> >> So for all code parts "owned" by the companies that signed the SGA >> need to be changed to ASF headers. The parts "owned" by the companies >> that didn't sign the SGA will need to stay unchanged. In that case, >> given the Apache license the code is already under, we can fork that >> code and add it to the ASF repo. >> >> No need stalling things even longer. >> >> Chris >> >>
