Then i will remove the Trave4j(LGPL that we are using in the code), and i will figure out if exist an third party that is using some LGPL and notify to you.
Best regards, Bertty On Thu 2. Sep 2021 at 18:30, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, it’s my point: if it’s included like this and third party use wayang > as dependencies, then the LGPL dependency will come transitively. > > So it’s not good IMHO. > > Regards > JB > > > Le 2 sept. 2021 à 18:28, Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> a > écrit : > > > > I think he means: Adding a dependency in a pom. > > > > It's technically not included in the Apache release. However if you > build something with it, the end product will have to contain it. (A sort > of borderline case is if it's used for testing, but isn't included in the > final output, but that's a slippery slope). > > > > So in the end if someone would be building something with our Apache > licensed library, in the end he would be stuck with something that's > technically LGPL ... that's why we don't like that license. > > > > Chris > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Jean-Baptiste Onofre <[email protected]> > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. September 2021 18:23 > > An: [email protected] > > Betreff: Re: Apache Wayang dependencies with other licenses > > > > What do you mean by « linking » ? You mean use it as dependency ? > > > > Regards > > JB > > > >> Le 2 sept. 2021 à 18:21, Alexander Alten <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> > >> Thats right, but linking per pom.xml is not an issue, isn’t? > >> > >> —Alex > >> > >>> On 2. Sep 2021, at 18:18, Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Alex, > >>> > >>> unfortunately this is not quite correct. Having LGPL2 is actually > something we are not allowed to use. > >>> > >>> Chris > >>> > >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >>> Von: Alexander Alten <[email protected]> > >>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. September 2021 08:25 > >>> An: [email protected] > >>> Betreff: Re: Apache Wayang dependencies with other licenses > >>> > >>> Hi folks, > >>> > >>> According to > >>> https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/5664/linking-from-lgpl > >>> -2-1-software-to-apache-2-0-library/5756#5756 > >>> > >>> the linking to LGPL2 libs is not problematic, the permissive part > applies. > >>> In general the use of other libs, which are not distributed over the > project, is fine. We just need to make sure that we reference the library > in the pom.xml file and not distribute them directly. > >>> BSD license, as well as MIT are compatible. > >>> > >>> Chris, and mentors - any comments here before we start to draft the > first release? > >>> > >>> Best, > >>> --alex > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Alexander Alten > >>> PPMC Apache Wayang > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021, 23:57 Rodrigo Pardo Meza > >>> <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi folks, > >>>> > >>>> @bertty contreras <[email protected]> and I have been > >>>> working on the first release. To this end: > >>>> > >>>> (1) We checked the maintenance state of the libraries actively used > >>>> by Wayang. One of them (HPI) has been deleted and Experiments > >>>> storage functionalities have been incorporated into the code of > >>>> Wayang in order to extend them. > >>>> > >>>> (2) We checked the licenses of the libraries currently used by > Wayang. > >>>> Not going further to the licenses of the dependencies of these > >>>> libraries (Only was checked the first level of the dependency tree > >>>> of Wayang). We found the next observations: > >>>> > >>>> - trove4j > >>>> <https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/net.sf.trove4j/trove4j> > >>>> has LGPL 2.1 license > >>>> - antlr4 > >>>> <https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.antlr/antlr4-runtime> > >>>> has BSD license > >>>> - paranamer > >>>> <https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.thoughtworks.paranamer/paran > >>>> am > >>>> er> has BSD licence. Spark has this dependency as well with runtime > >>>> scope, if Wayang does the same should be ok? > >>>> - hsqldb <https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.hsqldb/hsqldb> has > >>>> BSD license > >>>> > >>>> Someone can help us to find out if our project can use these > >>>> dependencies; otherwise, does anyone have suggestions of libraries > >>>> to replace them? > >>>> > >>>> Thanks in advance. > >>>> > >>>> Best regards > >>>> > >> > > > >
