Hello Folks,

I will change the file, because we just need a text to do a word count, I
think I will create a dummy file with just words to avoid issues with
licenses.

About the windows, I'm downloading the ISO to create a virtual machine to
figure the errors, and see well what is going on.

Best regards,
Bertty

On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 6:09 PM Alexander Alten <[email protected]> wrote:

> Heya Chris,
>
> Thanks for finding!
> @bertty, do we need Ulysses in the release?
>
> Re: Windows 10 - I’d say we file a Jira and see if we get a need from the
> community. Until than we flag the release with no support for Windows 10.
> Thoughts?
>
> Cheers,
>  —Alex
>
> > On 18. Oct 2021, at 14:23, Christofer Dutz <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > so I had to vote -1 on the release ... I would have probably voted +1 if
> there hadn't been a version of Ulysses added to the codebase. This is a
> very old document, however in the EU this is already expired, except for
> Spain, where it will be expired next year. The problem is that in the US
> ist's still not expired till 2030. So we generally can't just let that pass.
> >
> > Please be sure to check the license of stuff you copy. I know this might
> be important, but as you can see ... this little file will block your
> release.
> >
> > Also did I notice, that building no longer works on Windows. On the one
> side RAT on windows works slightly different ... at least it reports things
> not reported on Linux (like the "scala", "resources" and "java" files which
> contain paths). But if I tell rat to ignore them, I still can't build as
> plugins are complaining that these files are not directories (Which sort of
> makes sense).
> >
> > If windows is intentionally not a target system, this should be
> mentioned prominently (Ideally the build should fail, telling the user that
> Windows is not supported). If it's supported, it should build on Windows.
> >
> > Sorry fort he bad news :(
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: jorge Arnulfo Quiané Ruiz <[email protected]>
> > Gesendet: Freitag, 15. Oktober 2021 15:44
> > An: [email protected]
> > Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Wayang 0.6.0 RC3
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > Everything looks ok and I compiled the code without issues in both Java
> 8 and Java 11.
> >
> > Best,
> > Jorge
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 2:29 PM Rodrigo Pardo Meza <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hello Folks,
> >>
> >> I check the signatures, and modifications that Chris recommended in
> >> the RC1 and it looks like everything it's ok.
> >>
> >> The code compiles without any issue in Java 8 and Java 11.
> >>
> >> @Alex you need to check if everything runs well on the ARM processor.
> >>
> >> I think this release is well done this time.
> >>
> >> By the way, Alex, I merge your pull request :D
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Rodrigo
> >>
> >> El vie, 15 oct 2021 a las 9:34, Alexander Alten (<[email protected]>)
> >> escribió:
> >>
> >>> Heya Bertty,
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>> Just fixed some typos in the release notes via PR.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> —Alex
> >>>
> >>>> On 15. Oct 2021, at 01:53, Bertty Contreras <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hello people
> >>>>
> >>>> Please, any questions or concerns about the current release
> >>>> candidate
> >> can
> >>>> be discussed here in this thread. So the VOTE thread stays clean.
> >>>>
> >>>> Otherwise, it is often difficult to see how people voted.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks in advance.
> >>>>
> >>>> Sincerely!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to