the documentation step had problem even in TravisCI, and I will take care
of it to have it done in GA:D



On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:17 AM CalvinKirs <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> At present, only the automatic push of documents has not been done,
> because I am not familiar with it. In addition, all functions of TravisCI
> have been migrated to GithubAction
>
>
> Best wishes!
> Calvin Kirs
>
>
> On 03/18/2022 17:07,Alexander Alten<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +0
>
> I’m fine with both, but having both - I don’t know. But I support every
> decision :)
>
> Cheers,
> —Alex
>
> On 18. Mar 2022, at 10:05, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It seems the GA coverage is pretty close to Travis, so, I think we can
> remove Travis and focus on GA.
>
> My €0.01 ;)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 11:41 PM Bertty Contreras <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> Today I ran one compilation and the differences between TravisCI and Github
> Actions in terms of start running the job does not have a comparison.
>
> Additionally to that @CalvinKirs migrate all the pipelines that we had in
> TravisCI to Github Action
>
> Do we remove TravisCI?? because at this moment it is just a redundant
> process.
>
> Best regards,
> Bertty
>

Reply via email to