I assume you are asking about styles/colours and not content: I think it's *very* good. I like it. It's visually attractive, and tye colours and styles score high on usability. Everything is easy to read, and the contrast is very nice. It looks interesting, without having a colour excess.
As for contents, I think the best so far is Alexandro's page plus the edits I suggested. Cheers, Daniel. On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 10:49:08AM +1100, Matthew Wardrop wrote: > Hey everyone! > > When Daniel Carrera submitted his proposal, I though generally that is > was very good, as with my original one, and Andrew Brown's, which was > based on Daniel's anyway. > > However, I thought all of them were missing something, including my own, > when I went back to it. > > Although I have not yet put the content in, this one seems (to me) to be > the best one yet. I am aware that it does not follow the trend of where > I was going, although it may follow Daniel's trajectory, but please, > have a look and evaluate this page. If people don't like it, I'll go > back and fix up Daniel's page, as was expected. > > Here it is: http://members.ii.net/~colins_electrical/ooodevel/2/ . > > Could you please reply soon, so that I know which branch to work on. > > P.S. I know that I have not incorporated all of Daniel's site's great > features, but if all goes well, I will import them soon. > > Thankyou. > > Kind Regards, > -- > Matthew Wardrop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Daniel Carrera | I know everything, I just can't remember Join OOoAuthors today! | it all at once. http://www.oooauthors.org | :-) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
