Hi all,
Well, I tried to force a march to finish website designs by the end of this week but in the last week not only have we seen some good designs but also some excellent critiques of process. But I do really think that we need to act on this and set a hard deadline with mockups as well as requirements to illustrate what we are thinking.

The issues, to summarize (see the wiki [0] for a lot more):

* Basic Goals:

A. To enable efficient downloading, especially for naive Windows users.

This usually translates to one-click downloading. And one click downloading means that users do not learn of cdroms, p2p, etc. The resolution is to do what we do now, modulated: after the click, user is sent to the contribution page, which can have other elements, such as, "Consider buying a CDROM or downloading via P2P if you experience difficulty downloading".

B. To inform users of OpenOffice.org, the product and community/ project and how they can participate.

We can resolve this with buttons and short descriptions, eg., "The best free productivity suite" is fairly efficient. I think having the mini icons as we have now is useful but not crucial; it can be placed elsewhere. As to the project and participation: a tab is useful--and I'd suggest, expected--and continues with the established look, something that I acknowledge is important to continue with, though by no means to be held slave to.

I envision a page that has links for support, participation, language communities; extensions are important. "Support" can be in the end "portal" or we may end up having a big link to 'portal' once we have more content there--and that's going to happen. :-)

But we need to keep the information on the home page as simple and thus simply effective as possible, esp. given the focus of our goals. Secondary pages can add more information. Thus, portal can provide all that "new to OOo?" promises, as well as other useful information and links.


* Process

I had hoped that we could have been able to finish the requirements phase by now and come up with mockups based on the key ones. We are not really in agreement and I see no point insisting on one mockup over another if the community who will own it disagrees. :-)

David also raised the idea that I'd considered at one point of paying for a usability testing. I'm open to that; we can pay for it and that may help. I do confess to being skeptical, however. What do others think?

Assuming we do not use usability testing--or even if we do--I'd like to still impose a deadline, and make it a hard one: 15 December. Note, I first introduced this idea in September ;-), though I recognize the time consuming nature of work like this....

Given, too, the increasing length of the requirements page, and the double goals --is it the homepage or the putative portal? is this all about just users? I'd suggest we split the pages and thus clarify our focus. We would have:

* homepage requirements: what goes on the homepage
* and the established user page requirements: what goes on the portal (assuming that is what it is) and ancillary pages (note: more than one).

The homepage requirements would be an set of those things in user requirements but would allow us to focus. (I'll go through the list and see about creating the homepage wiki requirements but if someone else wants to help out, I'd be more than grateful.)

I also think it makes sense for someone to own this. I can (more or less futilely) drive this but I think it makes more sense for a designer to own it. And we have some quite talented people here ;-), including Maarten, Christian, Filip, William, Kay, Matthias, Kay, et al.


Finally, as to payment: Sun wants a better homepage for OOo and that is, among other things, my goad. They are willing to pay for the design. My interest is in ensuring it is a community thing, owned and maintained by the community. But that does not mean that Sun can't pay for the labour required for the design and implementation.

Best
louis












[0] http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/User_Pages_Requirements

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to