Hi Marcus, all

I've got the download buttons ready, but I will have to do some
restructuring in the CSS to make this more future-proof (currently
only one instance of each button is allowed because id's control
everything). And IE is being a royal pain. At the same time, I'd like
to make the CSS classes more semantic than #optionitem1 (e.g.
something like .button-green)

You can see the buttons at:
http://download.openoffice.org/cachedimages/option4-bg.png (for RCs) and
http://download.openoffice.org/cachedimages/option5-bg.png (for dev builds)
I've lightened the download arrow for the RC builds a little and used
the darker orange arrow for the dev build image.

Regards,
Ivan.

On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:32 AM, Marcus Lange <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ivan M wrote:
>
> Hi Ivan,
>
>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Marcus Lange <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> * The page does not seem to scale to 800x600
>>>
>>> AFAIK the requirement for all websites is to support 1024x768 as minimum.
>>> Do
>>> you still work with 800x600?
>>
>> Thankfully, no :). But the Download home page displays reasonably well
>> at 800x600 with no horizontal scrolling, so I was just wondering why
>> your proposal does not seem to scale for widths below 1024px. It's not
>> a major issue - there probably aren't very many people still using
>> 800x600, but if can be scaled down, why not? I can help out with this
>> if necessary - it should be reasonably easy to do.
>
> OK, we should keep an eye on 800x600 if possible but concentrate on
> 1024x768.
>
>>>> * The blue and green download buttons should not be used for RCs/Dev
>>>> builds  - e.g. from the download homepage, their meanings are: blue
>>>> download button is for extensions, green button is for stable major
>>>> releases. I would advise against recontextualizing these buttons.
>>>
>>> I've made 4 rows just to see if this would still fit on the page. I think
>>> we
>>> will not see 4 rows in live but who knows. However, I've removed it now.
>>>
>>> Also the colors will change. Have you seen my color suggestion in the
>>> previous posting?
>>
>> I'm not sure how fiery the buttons should be to alert users about
>> these downloads - I would suggest:
>
> What about the little disclaimer text above the colored links? Do you think
> it is sufficient? If so, then we can use some not that fiery colors maybe.
>
>> - Lime for RCs (more yellow than green) -or- the same as the bottom
>> button on download.OOo
>
> I would like to see the same yellow as on download.ooo.
>
>> - Orange for Dev 310
>> - The same for Dev 300 if both have a similar status as dev builds -
>> having two different colors would suggest (IMO) that one is less
>> stable than the other (I'm not sure if this is the case or not - if it
>> is, then something darker than the button for Dev 310 would be
>> appropriate)
>
> I suggested different colors because of the different codelines. To make the
> difference also clear from the colors, not only from the text. But in
> general both are unstable builds.
>
> At this level OOO300 is more stable than DEV300. But this is changing
> always. ;-)
>
> IMHO we should see both codelines as unstable as this will be true most of
> the time. So, orange would be nice or light red.
>
>> I can make up some buttons based on whatever colors are chosen if
>> you'd like, and I can add some extra styles to the main download
>> stylesheet to fix the current CSS issues once the colors are decided
>> upon.
>
> It would be great if you can help with CSS styling. :-) I've uploaded the
> recent changes, so that my latest update is online now.
>
> Maybe you can create one orange (OOO310) and one light red (DEV300) colored
> link? Then we can see directly what looks better and what we should use
> finally.
>
>>>> Other page
>>>>
>>>> * Those gray tables look really unfriendly. Cells could really do with
>>>> some padding.
>>>
>>> In order to use a known color I've used the same gray from the bigger
>>> other.html page. Have you got a favorite color that you would like to
>>> see?
>>
>> It was more of a first impression, but in this case, the
>> 'unfriendliness' might even be functional (sending people who don't
>> know what they're doing away) :)
>
> I would say let us stay with this gray. We can change it later on when other
> people have the same feeling. Also here my latest update is online now.
>
> Thanks
>
> Marcus
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to