Hi Florian, Andy, all, Here are a few threads to look at for past discussions on this issue for those interested - but after you have read one thread you will probably get the overall thrust. Other threads provide more specifics for and against. I'm using mail-archive.com because I found its thread handling to be better than OO.o's in these particular cases:
On the Website list, we had this discussion: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg02943.html On the Art list, we also discussed action statements, starting with the bottom of this email: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg02466.html On the Marketing list, we had this discussion to help determine the wording of the action statements: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg06817.html One website that uses a similar approach is Land Transport NZ: http://transact.landtransport.govt.nz/ Many months ago, I had asked if we could get some website statistics to help us investigate if the action statements are working, if they might be improved, etc.... but nothing came out of that - it seems there are no web stats available. Another way to go about it might be to do a User Experience evaluation. I'm not against change, but since Maarten, the website project co-lead at the time approved of the action statements, I'm very much against a hasty decision. Regards, Ivan. On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 4:00 AM, Florian Effenberger<[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > >> Well I think he has a valid point, frankly. Further discussion? > > well, if it was up to me, I'd change it. However, I don't want to destroy > all previous discussion results. ;-) > > Florian > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
