Hi,
I've used the W3 validator for other used websites (next/index.html,
next/other.html, some release notes, etc.) and found many errors and
wanings. I've corrected them down to the remaining 4 that I cannot
access because they are outside of the website.
So, also these webpages are hopefully much better due to the used standards.
Best regards
Marcus
Stefan Weigel wrote:
thanks for taking care! Recent changes at least brought some
improvement. :-)
You may want to have a look into these validation tools:
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fdownload.openoffice.org%2F
--> 58 HTML errors
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?profile=css21&warning=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fdownload.openoffice.org%2F
--> 20 CSS errors, 147 warnings
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
