flex-grow is already supported by flex shorthand, and it’s possible to support flex-shrink in later version. While, flex-basis is the same as main size which is supported already except for percent value. I think support percent unit is a huge, duplicate and unnecessary work for most CSS style, after all I am trying to achieve an elegant implementation of CSS, excluding dummy, heavy, duplicate part of CSS. But It makes sense that flex-basis should support and only support percent value. For baseline, I think if iOS Framework is able to pass ascent, descent, half-leading, top and bottom to layout engine, layout engine itself has no problem to manipulate these values.
> 在 2017年10月12日，17:16，xing zhang <zhangxing610...@gmail.com> 写道： > > Should we consider about layout percent unit, flex-shrink, flex-grow, > flexBasis, and baseline in align-Items ? > > 2017-10-12 16:54 GMT+08:00 申远 <shenyua...@gmail.com>: > >> Dear all, >> >> I’m considering replacing Facebook/Yoga to a new layout system based on >> Google/Flexbox due to Facebook’s additional patent issue. Besides, this new >> layout system will provide some new css style like order, etc. >> >> Any advise for the new layout system? >> >> PS: I need some advise about the name of the layout system.
