Actually, I think
https://cn.aliyun.com/solution/emas?spm=a2c7j.-zh-community-biz-emas.0.0.5daac8eecHbyWI
already is an external website for EMAS - so this can probably just be
listed under "Tools using Apache Weex" on the new Apache Weex website.

Am Fr., 1. März 2019 um 11:17 Uhr schrieb Jan Piotrowski <piotrow...@gmail.com>:
>
> I understood that, and that is exactly why EMAS can not be under one
> of the official domains being used for Apache Weex. As weex.io is a
> plain redirect, it will be considered as "part of Apache Weex" by the
> users. If EMAS uses the same domain, users will make the same
> assumption here - which is not true.
>
> The content from http://emas.weex.io/zh/community/biz-emas.html should
> be extracted into its own website that does not share anything with
> the Apache Weex project website. Something non Apache-Weex can't just
> copy the whole website and add a few pages, as this will greatly
> confuse users. (If EMAS was historically available under that domain,
> of course all the old links can be redirected to its new domains so
> they keep working.)
>
> EMAS can (and should! it's awesome something like that exists) of
> course be listed on the official Apache Weex website as "enterprise
> mobile development solution based on Apache Weex" or similar.
>
> Take Apache Cordova and Adobe Phonegap as an example. Apache Cordova
> is https://cordova.apache.org/. Phonegap is https://phonegap.com/ and
> builds on Apache Cordova. It mentions Cordova on its website and links
> to Apache Cordova.
>
> But as with all other not-really-Apache-Weex things, the
> differentiation has to be made 100% clear. Ther should be no confusion
> for users what is _Apache_ Weex and what is tools for or other
> software built on Weex.
>
> -J
>
> Am Fr., 1. März 2019 um 03:16 Uhr schrieb 申远 <shenyua...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Technically speaking, EMAS is an enterprise mobile develop solution based
> > on weex, and I think the target users of EMAS are Chinese. Actually, there
> > is an entry[1] for EMAS in Chinese document. Besides that, there is no
> > difference between http://weex.apache.org and http://emas.weex.io/ .
> >
> > And Weex projcet always declared that http://weex.apache.org or
> > http://weex.io are the official homepage.
> >
> > [1] http://emas.weex.io/zh/community/biz-emas.html
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > YorkShen
> >
> > 申远
> >
> >
> > Jan Piotrowski <piotrow...@gmail.com> 于2019年2月28日周四 下午10:08写道:
> >
> > > I don't understand.
> > >
> > > A "commercial eco system for weex" should not just mirror the complete
> > > site, even (and especially!) if they add their own things.
> > > Right now I have no idea what this really is when I go there, so this
> > > should definitely be cleaned up.
> > >
> > > -J
> > >
> > > Am Do., 28. Feb. 2019 um 04:24 Uhr schrieb 申远 <shenyua...@gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > > EMAS is a commercial eco-system for weex, so this url[1] should not be
> > > > redirected to https:/weex.apache.org
> > > >
> > > > I have talked to guys of EMAS, they are using the source code of
> > > > incubator-weex-site [2] and some third-party content to build the
> > > website,
> > > > while weex only use incubator-weex-site [2]
> > > >
> > > > [1] http://emas.weex.io/
> > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/incubator-weex-site/
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > > YorkShen
> > > >
> > > > 申远
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Jan Piotrowski <piotrow...@gmail.com> 于2019年2月28日周四 上午5:37写道:
> > > >
> > > > > Nice!
> > > > >
> > > > > Just found http://emas.weex.io/ which is not redirecting yet.
> > > > >
> > > > > J
> > > > >
> > > > > Am Mi., 27. Feb. 2019 um 07:00 Uhr schrieb 申远 <shenyua...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://weex-project.io is also redirected to http://weex.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Except for the following issue, I think we have done the relaunch
> > > > > procedure
> > > > > > of website:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >    - Google Search Console Account
> > > > > >    - Redirect http://weex.apache.org to https://weex.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > YorkShen
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 申远
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dan <faterr...@gmail.com> 于2019年2月27日周三 上午11:53写道:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The server should just be a Apache webserver (of course!) that
> > > can
> > > > > > > accept .htaccess files to redirect non-http requests.
> > > > > > > Super complicated example from Cordova:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/blob/3c41a7d14192eb26c883c65fc63be303f811474e/www/.htaccess#L118-L130
> > > > > > > There should be much easier ways to achieve this.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I will take a look and try to make weex.apache.org work with
> > > non-http.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Dan
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 申远 <shenyua...@gmail.com> 于2019年2月27日周三 上午11:08写道:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The check has passed now.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > > > YorkShen
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 申远
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Willem Jiang <willem.ji...@gmail.com> 于2019年2月22日周五 下午8:08写道:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > FYI, there is a tool[1] to check if the website is following
> > > the
> > > > > Apache
> > > > > > > > > rules.
> > > > > > > > > Please take a look and fix them ASAP. The website issues need
> > > to be
> > > > > > > > > addressed before graducation.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > [1]https://whimsy.apache.org/pods.cgi/project/weex
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Willem Jiang
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Twitter: willemjiang
> > > > > > > > > Weibo: 姜宁willem
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 7:58 PM 申远 <shenyua...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > It seems like INFRA is not ok the mirror site in China.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Anyway, I have updated the content of
> > > https://weex.apache.org/,
> > > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > the same as https://weex.io now. *As there is a
> > > > > > > > > > privilege issue, https://weex-project.io/ <
> > > > > https://weex-project.io/>
> > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > > updated yet.*
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Later, I will redirect https://weex.io and
> > > > > https://weex-project.io/
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > https://weex.apache.org/ using 302 redirection and configure
> > > > > robots.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Feedback of the new design for https://weex.apache.org/ is
> > > > > welcomed.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > YorkShen
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 申远
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Jan Piotrowski <piotrow...@gmail.com> 于2019年2月20日周三
> > > 下午8:02写道:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Good question comment you posted on the INFRA post.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I hope they will agree, that there is no problem at all as
> > > > > long as
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > official website is at weex.apache.org.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > -J
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Am Mi., 20. Feb. 2019 um 09:48 Uhr schrieb 申远 <
> > > > > > > shenyua...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > >:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > But until this happens I think an absolutely practical
> > > > > solution
> > > > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > be to use a second host in China with a separate 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > domain
> > > > > that
> > > > > > > can
> > > > > > > > > > > > > provide better speeds to Chinese users. It just has to
> > > > > show the
> > > > > > > > > exact
> > > > > > > > > > > > > same content as the official site (and be hidden from
> > > > > search
> > > > > > > > > engines
> > > > > > > > > > > > > via robots.txt to not confuse them). INFRA should have
> > > no
> > > > > real
> > > > > > > > > problem
> > > > > > > > > > > > > with that (as it is a appropriate workaround for their
> > > slow
> > > > > > > > > response
> > > > > > > > > > > > > times in China - and no branding stuff is ignored).
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Deploying the same content to two different host and
> > > > > domains
> > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > what
> > > > > > > > > > > we
> > > > > > > > > > > > are planning to do until we understand it may still
> > > break one
> > > > > > > > domain
> > > > > > > > > > > rule.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2. According to
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17872
> > > > > > > > ,
> > > > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > > > > think
> > > > > > > > > > > > INFRA have different point of view on separate domain
> > > with
> > > > > same
> > > > > > > > > content.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 3. Personally speaking, I understand a world wide CDN is
> > > not
> > > > > > > > > practical
> > > > > > > > > > > now
> > > > > > > > > > > > and sometimes one may give up a better engineer solution
> > > due
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > law
> > > > > > > > > > > issue.
> > > > > > > > > > > > From user points, we need to give a brief explanation of
> > > the
> > > > > > > > latency
> > > > > > > > > > > > problem.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > YorkShen
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 申远
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Jan Piotrowski <piotrow...@gmail.com> 于2019年2月20日周三
> > > > > 上午2:24写道:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Uh, the _domain name_ is not actually at all related
> > > to the
> > > > > > > speed
> > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the site - the _hosting_ is.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > My results for those two domains from Germany, Berlin
> > > for
> > > > > > > > example:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > C:\Users\Jan>ping weex.io
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Pinging weex.io [47.75.160.176] with 32 bytes of data:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Reply from 47.75.160.176: bytes=32 time=327ms TTL=46
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Reply from 47.75.160.176: bytes=32 time=327ms TTL=46
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Reply from 47.75.160.176: bytes=32 time=327ms TTL=46
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Reply from 47.75.160.176: bytes=32 time=335ms TTL=46
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Ping statistics for 47.75.160.176:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >     Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0%
> > > loss),
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >     Minimum = 327ms, Maximum = 335ms, Average = 329ms
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > C:\Users\Jan>ping weex.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Pinging weex.apache.org [2a01:4f9:2a:185f::2] with 32
> > > > > bytes of
> > > > > > > > > data:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Reply from 2a01:4f9:2a:185f::2: time=46ms
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Reply from 2a01:4f9:2a:185f::2: time=46ms
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Reply from 2a01:4f9:2a:185f::2: time=49ms
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Reply from 2a01:4f9:2a:185f::2: time=46ms
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Ping statistics for 2a01:4f9:2a:185f::2:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >     Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0%
> > > loss),
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >     Minimum = 46ms, Maximum = 49ms, Average = 46ms
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > So you should be aware that the actual problem (Apache
> > > > > server
> > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > slow
> > > > > > > > > > > > > from China) is a different one that is now discussed
> > > with
> > > > > INFRA
> > > > > > > > > (Can
> > > > > > > > > > > > > project use a different domain).
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The only real solution is for INFRA to use a world
> > > wide CDN
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > fast everywhere.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > But until this happens I think an absolutely practical
> > > > > solution
> > > > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > be to use a second host in China with a separate 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > domain
> > > > > that
> > > > > > > can
> > > > > > > > > > > > > provide better speeds to Chinese users. It just has to
> > > > > show the
> > > > > > > > > exact
> > > > > > > > > > > > > same content as the official site (and be hidden from
> > > > > search
> > > > > > > > > engines
> > > > > > > > > > > > > via robots.txt to not confuse them). INFRA should have
> > > no
> > > > > real
> > > > > > > > > problem
> > > > > > > > > > > > > with that (as it is a appropriate workaround for their
> > > slow
> > > > > > > > > response
> > > > > > > > > > > > > times in China - and no branding stuff is ignored).
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > -J
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Am Di., 19. Feb. 2019 um 12:57 Uhr schrieb Myrle
> > > Krantz <
> > > > > > > > > > > my...@apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've created an INFRA ticket:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17872
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I won't promise that INFRA can solve this, but
> > > hopefully
> > > > > > > > they'll
> > > > > > > > > at
> > > > > > > > > > > least
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > look at it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Feel free to add any details you have.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Myrle
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 7:18 AM Dan <
> > > faterr...@gmail.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Jan, I will take a look at this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jan Piotrowski <piotrow...@gmail.com>
> > > 于2019年2月18日周一
> > > > > > > > 下午6:15写道:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cordova uses the npm package `insight` for
> > > > > telemetry, you
> > > > > > > > > can see
> > > > > > > > > > > > > more
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in these two files:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/cordova-cli/blob/master/src/telemetry.js
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/cordova-cli/blob/master/src/cli.js
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The data being tracked is very limited, and all
> > > done
> > > > > only
> > > > > > > > > after
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explicit opt-in by the user. (You get a prompt
> > > when
> > > > > you
> > > > > > > > first
> > > > > > > > > > > install
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cordova).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The dashboard itself is built on the Google
> > > Analytics
> > > > > > > data
> > > > > > > > > source
> > > > > > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > collects the data for pretty graphs.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One problem: I am under the impression that
> > > Google
> > > > > > > > Analytics
> > > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > blocked for good parts of Chinese users, so
> > > Cordova's
> > > > > > > data
> > > > > > > > > > > regarding
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > usage in China is probably very broken.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -J
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am Mo., 18. Feb. 2019 um 08:29 Uhr schrieb Dan <
> > > > > > > > > > > faterr...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Jan,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for getting back to me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your opinion has helped us a lot. We will
> > > migrate
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > deployment
> > > > > > > > > > > > > of the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > document to weex.apache.org in these two days.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, do you know the detail about how to do 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > user-track
> > > > > > > > > > > bellow
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > apache way, I know the Cordova has
> > > > > > > telemetry.cordova.io
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > record
> > > > > > > > > > > > > it,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we also want to record the user's behavior in
> > > the
> > > > > > > > > weex-toolkit
> > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > help
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > us
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > better improve the tool experience.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jan Piotrowski <piotrow...@gmail.com>
> > > > > 于2019年2月15日周五
> > > > > > > > > 下午7:42写道:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Besides what the rules say (which I don't
> > > really
> > > > > > > know):
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > An apache.org domain has an incredible
> > > effect on
> > > > > > > > > > > credibility and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > trust. Apache is a really strong brand with
> > > > > > > developers,
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > especially
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > new projects like Weex can benefit from 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (The project will be called "Apache Weex"
> > > anyway)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Apache Cordova owns the cordova.io domain
> > > and
> > > > > uses
> > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > as a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > redirect
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cordova.apache.org. That way we can still
> > > tell
> > > > > > > people
> > > > > > > > > to go
> > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "cordova.io", but on Google and in user's
> > > > > browser
> > > > > > > > > everything
> > > > > > > > > > > > > happens
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on apache.cordova.org. We also have loads of
> > > > > > > > subdomains
> > > > > > > > > like
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > blog.cordova.io issues.cordova.io,
> > > > > slack.cordova.io,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > telemetry.cordova.io and so on as shortcuts
> > > > > which is
> > > > > > > > > very
> > > > > > > > > > > handy.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Using the domains you mentioned, weex.io
> > > could
> > > > > > > > redirect
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > weex.apache.org, docs.weex.io redirects to
> > > > > > > > > > > weex.apache.org/docs,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > blog.weex.io to weex.apache.org/blog and so
> > > on.
> > > > > Then
> > > > > > > > > > > cn.weex.io
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > could
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > redirect to weex-project.io for easier
> > > finding
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > Chinese
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > domain.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -J
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 15. Feb 2019, at 07:38, Dan <
> > > > > > > faterr...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, Myrle/Willem,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Currently, we have a domain name of
> > > weex.io
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > want
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > use
> > > > > > > > > > > > > it to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > replace
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the previous weex-project.io domain name
> > > for
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > following
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reasons:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. The domain name is shorter and easier 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > remember.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Apache's website has slower access to
> > > the
> > > > > > > > developer
> > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > China, so
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is a mirror website weex-project.io for
> > > > > Chinese
> > > > > > > > > developer.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3. We expect to support https on this
> > > website
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > support
> > > > > > > > > > > some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > our own
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > server functions, such as Q&A robots,
> > > article
> > > > > blog
> > > > > > > > > posts,
> > > > > > > > > > > etc.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to ask if apache has any
> > > > > restrictions
> > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > third-party
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > domain name, and look forward to hearing
> > > from
> > > > > you.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >

Reply via email to