Agree not to rename. Maybe [1] should also be in your list. When we use command weex platform add android or weex platform add iOS, the code generated in the platform is from [1]. And it looks like [1] nobody has maintained it.
[1] https://github.com/weex-templates 在 2019/11/8 下午5:19，“申远”<shenyua...@gmail.com> 写入: Agreed, there is no silver bullet, either way will cost us months of time, at least. Best Regards, YorkShen 申远 王 思波 <zhongwang2...@hotmail.com> 于2019年11月8日周五 下午2:48写道： > Renaming weex is not recommended, as you are worried about, it is likely > to lose many users. > ________________________________ > 发件人: 申远 <shenyua...@gmail.com> > 发送时间: 2019年11月7日 12:01 > 收件人: dev <d...@weex.apache.org> > 主题: [DISCUSS] Weex branding issues > > Hi, community. > > I just write down a list about projects may violate the trademark of Weex. > Feel free to append yours. > > Based my understanding, Weex must product a podling name search before > graduation: > > - We could rename Weex to some other name, so that there is no need to > solve the branding issues at all. The cost is that we may lose the brand > and reputation we built for years. > - We could also convince the project owners in the list to rename their > project or donate to ASF so that they could continue use the trademark > of > Weex. Either way, it will costs us lots of time, several months at > least. > > I am not sure which is the best way. > > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WEEX/Branding+issues > > Best Regards, > YorkShen > > 申远 >
