Hi Sam,

Is this to say that the new new secmail is now ready for real life testing, or 
something else.

Craig

> On Jan 4, 2016, at 1:40 PM, Sam Ruby <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Just a friendly reminder, at some point in the future (possibly soon)
> the infrastructure team is going to move away from minotaur, which
> will have an unknown impact on the secmail function.
> 
> I've added some minor functions (a pre-check of userids in the
> background for availability even before you submit the form, and
> better recognition of detached signatures), but lacking in feedback on
> this, I'm moving on to other things.
> 
> - Sam Ruby
> 
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Sam Ruby <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Sam Ruby <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Sam Ruby <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Sam Ruby <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I would like to explore having
>>>>> the current 'staple' function be done via dragging and dropping of images
>>>>> and PDFs on top of one another.
>>>> 
>>>> I've pushed out a change roughing in the UI for this... if a given
>>>> message has two or more attachments, you can drag and drop one on top
>>>> of another.  At the moment, it only issues an alert telling you what
>>>> you have done.  In the future, this will send a request to the server
>>>> to perform the appropriate conversions to PDF (as required) and
>>>> concatenation.
>>> 
>>> I'm slowly adding functions to this.
>> 
>> This could be ready in early January.  Latest additions: signature
>> verification, and the server side of ICLA processing (minus the actual
>> commit).  So if you go through the motions of filing an icla, a
>> document should appear in documents/iclas, and
>> foundation/officers/iclas.txt should be updated on your machine, but
>> won't actually be committed (yet).
>> 
>> Both of these are examples of modularity.
>> 
>> The signature processing is encapsulated into two files (client/server):
>> 
>> https://github.com/apache/whimsy/blob/secmail/www/secmail/views/check-signature.js.rb
>> https://github.com/apache/whimsy/blob/secmail/www/secmail/views/actions/check-signature.json.rb
>> 
>> Similarly, the icla processing is encapsulated into two files 
>> (client/server):
>> 
>> https://github.com/apache/whimsy/blob/secmail/www/secmail/views/forms/icla.js.rb
>> https://github.com/apache/whimsy/blob/secmail/www/secmail/views/actions/icla.json.rb
>> 
>> Looking at recent traffic, it looks like it would be worthwhile to add
>> checks to ensure that public names are unique.  This would be a
>> straightforward addition to the actions/icla.json.rb file mentioned
>> above.
>> 
>> All code is being developed on Mac OS/X El Capitan (10.11.2), an
>> should work there.  I don't expect any problems deploying this code on
>> Ubuntu Trusty (14.04.3)
>> 
>> - Sam Ruby

Craig L Russell
Architect, Oracle
http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[email protected]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

Reply via email to