> On Apr 7, 2017, at 3:49 PM, Sam Ruby <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Shane Curcuru <[email protected]> wrote: >> Craig Russell wrote on 4/7/17 4:17 PM: >>> I notice that there is no component Secmail in whimsy JIRA. >> >> Is "SecWorkbench" close enough to cover that area, or do you want a >> second area to differentiate? We don't have that many bugs yet. Also, >> if so, do you want to automatically be assigned bugs in the component? >> >> But I am an admin, I do have the power now! (You have to ask for it, >> it's not an automatic PMC priv). > > So save me the trouble, and make Craig an admin too :-)
+1 > >>> I tried to figure out how to create the component and I could not get in to >>> administer JIRA whimsy. >>> >>> So, should I (and any PMC member) be able to administer JIRA Whimsy? > > +1 > >>> And does anyone object to adding a Secmail component? > > Not I, but see the P.S. below. I'm not sure it makes a difference. Dunno why the P.S. but whatever. > >>> Craig L Russell >>> [email protected] > > - Sam Ruby > > P.S. I still would like to move secmail to secretary/mail and update > the front page to remove the old workbench and the (experimental) tag > on the mail tool. +1 And on jira, remove the sec workbench component and replace it with secretary mail component secretary workbench was useful in its time but is no longer usable secretary mail is no longer experimental. we could rename it workbench but that would be the jira tail waving sam's dog Craig L Russell [email protected]
