Thanks for digging in! I never expected deliverability problems in this direction before, but the root cause makes sense.
On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 9:32 AM Craig Russell <[email protected]> wrote: > > That would explain it. Case closed. Thanks for analyzing the logs. > > Craig > > > On Jun 8, 2022, at 07:13, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Infra made a change to a mailbox size limit which caused problems for > > the mail system. > > > > The Whimsy mail.log has lots of messages such as: > > > > fatal: main.cf configuration error: mailbox_size_limit is smaller > > than message_size_limit > > > > These errors started at Jun 6 02:26:54 and stopped at Jun 7 18:38:26 > > > > AFAICT this allowed messages to be delivered to Whimsy, but they could > > not be forwarded to the mailbox. > > > > It appears that the mail system did eventually deliver the messages to > > the Whimsy process. > > > > I think this is the cause of the delayed appearance of the mails. > > > > On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 at 14:54, Craig Russell <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Sebb, > >> > >> I've privately forwarded the four ICLAs mentioned in my previous email. > >> These did eventually show up in secretary workbench after more than a day. > >> > >>> Apache Linkis Committer ICLA 03:29 5.4 MB > >>> Filled example 05:22 98KB (detached signature) > >>> ICLA 05:56 85KB > >>> Invitation to become Linkis committer: <name elided> 08:44 254KB (script > >>> signature) > >> > >> I hope you can figure out what happened. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Craig > >> > >> > >>> On Jun 8, 2022, at 02:52, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> AFAICT the new entries in the workbench were all created recently. > >>> > >>> When I wrote, I'm pretty sure that there were no outstanding emails. > >>> Unfortunately I did not keep the data I used. > >>> Maybe there was a delay in sending some of the mails. > >>> > >>> If you have got some examples that you think should have been > >>> displayed, please send me details (privately, or to secretary@) and I > >>> will have a look. > >>> > >>> Sebb > >>> > >>> On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 at 21:19, Craig Russell <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> After 30 hour outage, the workbench is back. > >>>> > >>>> What happened? > >>>> > >>>> Craig > >>>> > >>>>> On Jun 7, 2022, at 13:13, Craig Russell <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Maybe we should consider sending secretary workbench over to infra... > >>>>> > >>>>> Craig > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Jun 7, 2022, at 11:33, Craig Russell <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Sorry for not replying all... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> There is still nothing in the workbench and more ICLAs have come in > >>>>>> since yesterday. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I cannot troubleshoot this one... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Craig > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Jun 6, 2022, at 16:14, Craig Russell <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi Sebb, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I see these in my inbox to secretary: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> subject/date (PDT)/size > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Apache Linkis Committer ICLA 03:29 5.4 MB > >>>>>>> Filled example 05:22 98KB (detached signature) > >>>>>>> ICLA 05:56 85KB > >>>>>>> Invitation to become Linkis committer: <name elided> 08:44 254KB > >>>>>>> (script signature) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Have these been handled, or are they missing from others' inboxes? Is > >>>>>>> there a mail trail to follow? I can send headers if that will help... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Craig > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Jun 6, 2022, at 15:45, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 at 23:08, Craig Russell <[email protected]> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> while several ICLAs have been received. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> The workbench only displays emails that have attachments and that are > >>>>>>>> not marked as deleted. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> AFAICT there are no such emails. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Craig L Russell > >>>>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Craig L Russell > >>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Craig L Russell > >>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Craig L Russell > >>>>> [email protected] > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Craig L Russell > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> > >> > >> Craig L Russell > >> [email protected] > >> > > Craig L Russell > [email protected] >
