[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13146701#comment-13146701
]
David Alves commented on WHIRR-414:
-----------------------------------
+1 The idea crossed my mind, but I didn't want to deviate from the initial
patch.
> whirr can have a non-zero return code and unterminated (orphaned) host
> instances
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WHIRR-414
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-414
> Project: Whirr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Affects Versions: 0.6.0
> Environment: EC2, commandline whirr
> Reporter: Paul Baclace
> Assignee: Andrei Savu
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.7.0
>
> Attachments: WHIRR-414.patch, WHIRR-414.patch, WHIRR-414.patch
>
>
> Whirr can fail to completely start a cluster and indicates this with a
> non-zero return code. In many (currently intermittent) partial failure
> scenarios, there are resources still active (EC2 machine instances, in my
> experience) that are not cleaned up.
> The log contains "IOException: Too many instance failed while bootstrapping!"
> when I have seen orphaned nodes.
> A non-zero return code should guarantee that all resources are cleaned up.
> Without this post-condition, these failures require manual inspection and
> cleanup to stop useless expenses (which is why I marked this bug critical; it
> needs to be addressed for any kind of cron job triggered whirr).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
