Hi
+1 on Andrei's suggestion.
Also my availability will increase quite a bit in the next couple of
weeks, i'll try to put in some work.
Cheers
-david
On Dec 6, 2011, at 11:49 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
>
> +1
>
> it makes sense for me.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 12/06/2011 06:38 PM, Andrei Savu wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I want to propose that we change from Review-Then-Commit to
>> Commit-Then-Review
>> for a while with the amendment that complicated changes still require code
>> review.
>>
>> The main reason I am asking this is because over the last few weeks I have
>> noticed
>> a lack of engagement from the members of the core development team and this
>> slows
>> down things a lot. I am happy to see more and more people using Whirr and I
>> think we
>> should keep on developing things as fast as possible.
>>
>> We can go back to RTC later as soon as we have 3+ active committers.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> -- Andrei Savu
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> [email protected]
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
