Good idea, Ioannis. I can help review stuff next weekend. -A
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Andrew Bayer <[email protected]> wrote: > I think we may want to get this into 0.8.1/0.9.0 - I'd like to push 0.8.0 > with what's in now and a couple other bugfixes/tweaks (namely WHIRR-525 and > WHIRR-189), and then get a bit crazy with refactoring. =) > > A. > > On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Ioannis Canellos <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> now that whirr is finally using jclouds 1.5.x, which contains great >> improvements regarding OSGi, I'd like to align whirr accordingly. >> >> As of jclouds 1.5.0 the scriptloader, inside OSGi will leverage services >> in order to load script and no longer considers flat classloaders. >> This allows some significant improvements in whirr: >> >> i) No longer use of OSGi fragments is required. >> ii) Since we no longer need fragments we can have proper bundles that can >> have an activator and no longer need blueprint. >> >> The later will allow ALL osgi users to use whirr without forcing them to >> use the blueprint. >> >> Since currently jira is down, I'll attach a patch here for anyone >> interested in having a peek and commit that later in the week. >> >> >> -- >> *Ioannis Canellos* >> * >> FuseSource <http://fusesource.com> >> >> ** >> Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com >> ** >> Twitter: iocanel >> * >> >> >>
