Thanks, Andrew!
On Aug 23, 2012 4:06 PM, "Andrew Bayer" <[email protected]> wrote:

> And I've removed it. Woo. Waiting 'til tomorrow to do the site deploy and
> announcement as suggested. branch-0.8 has been updated for 0.8.1-SNAPSHOT.
>
> A.
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Andrei Savu <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > I've just fixed the permission.
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Andrew Bayer <[email protected]
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Andrei, looks like the dist/whirr/whirr-0.7.1 directory doesn't have
> g+w
> > on
> > > it, so I can't delete it - could you do that when you get a chance?
> > >
> > > A.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Andrew Bayer <[email protected]
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm going to go ahead and release now.
> > > >
> > > > A.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Adrian Cole <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> +1
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Andrew Bayer <
> > [email protected]>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > So, given that no one else can reproduce Frank's build error, and
> > > given
> > > >> > that whenever we respin an RC we find other little things we'd
> like
> > to
> > > >> > add/fix, I'd like to suggest that, barring a shocker today, we
> > release
> > > >> > 0.8.0 as is, with the intention of getting 0.8.1 out within a few
> > > weeks,
> > > >> > with a newer jclouds beta and the rest of the wave of little fixes
> > > that
> > > >> are
> > > >> > coming in. Does that sound reasonable to everyone?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > A.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> > > [email protected]
> > > >> >wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> +1 (non binding)
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Regards
> > > >> >> JB
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> On 08/23/2012 11:05 AM, Ioannis Canellos wrote:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>> +1
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >> --
> > > >> >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > > >> >> [email protected]
> > > >> >> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > > >> >> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to