Thanks for going through the process of getting the jar on the way to
maven, Andrea!  Can you summarize what that was in case it needs to be
done again?

-A

On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Andrea Turli <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've uploaded the vboxjws-4.2.0 to
> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/central-sync/org/virtualbox/vboxjws/4.2.0/
>
> So now jclouds-1.6.0-SNAPSHOT is using the last virtualbox version
> which seems much better in terms of session management.
>
> Best,
> Andrea
>
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Andrea Turli <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've updated the jclouds-virtualbox implementation to the latest release 
>> 4.2.0
>>
>> Here you can find more details about the status
>> http://code.google.com/p/jclouds/issues/detail?id=384
>>
>> I'm now waiting for an answer from virtualbox developers about making
>> available vboxjws-4.2.0.jar available on maven central,
>> to push this new version.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Andrea
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Andrea Turli <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> quick update on jclouds-virtualbox.
>>>
>>> The provider is still on labs, but after the last improvements, I've
>>> been able to successfully start up to 30 guests on my laptop without
>>> problems.
>>>
>>> I've also tested the jclouds-virtualbox provider with Apache Whirr:
>>>
>>> bin/whirr launch-cluster --config recipes/zookeeper.properties
>>> --private-key-file ~/.ssh/id_rsa_whirr --template
>>> osFamily=UBUNTU,osVersionMatches=12.04
>>>
>>> where $ cat recipes/zookeeper.properties
>>>
>>> #
>>> # Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
>>> # contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
>>> # this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
>>> # The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
>>> # (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
>>> # the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
>>> #
>>> #     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
>>> #
>>> # Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
>>> # distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
>>> # WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
>>> # See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
>>> # limitations under the License.
>>> #
>>>
>>> #
>>> # Deploy an Apache ZooKeeper cluster
>>> #
>>> whirr.cluster-name=zookeeper
>>> whirr.instance-templates=3 zookeeper
>>> whirr.bootstrap-user=toor:password
>>>
>>> with default ram size for the guests 1024 Mb, and everything seems to
>>> be in good shape.
>>>
>>> I think it is a good result :)
>>>
>>> If you are interested in having more details, feel free to ping me.
>>>
>>> Thanks everyone for great team work particularly
>>> Adrian Cole, David Alves, Mattias Holmqvist, Andrei Savu, Tony
>>> Batchelli, Andrew Bayer and Patrick Debois.
>>>
>>> Ciao,
>>> Andrea
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Adrian Cole <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> haha baby steps.
>>>>
>>>> -A
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Andrea Turli <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> I'd try using that
>>>>>> in a different package.  Ex. a LOT of the code is the same, regardless
>>>>>> of which api is used (ex. image construction, guest additions, etc),
>>>>>> so maybe make a package org.jclouds.virtualbox.xpcom and put things
>>>>>> like a ComputeServiceAdapter that uses xpcom?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> wdyt?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I agree with the idea of having a different package: at the moment I'm 
>>>>> using
>>>>> a simple eclipse project to test things.
>>>>> Unfortunately even if xpcom seems faster than SOAP and doesn't require a
>>>>> running vbox web server (good)
>>>>> the session reliability is still a problem with xpcom bridge as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe we could start a brave implementation of a third bridge: native :)
>>>>>
>>>>> wdyt?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>>>> "jclouds-dev" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/jclouds-dev?hl=en.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "jclouds-dev" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/jclouds-dev?hl=en.
>>>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "jclouds-dev" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/jclouds-dev?hl=en.
>

Reply via email to