[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13577915#comment-13577915
]
Vadas Gintautas commented on WHIRR-700:
---------------------------------------
Ok I've opened a pull request that fixes the obvious hardware specification
problem:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1312
However, when I build whirr against this, whirr still doesn't put hi1.4xlarge
instances into a placement group. Any thoughts about where to go from here?
> Cluster Compute Placement Groups don't work for hi1.4xlarge hardware
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WHIRR-700
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-700
> Project: Whirr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Affects Versions: 0.8.1
> Reporter: Vadas Gintautas
>
> Placement groups work for cc1.4xlarge and cc2.8xlarge instances but don't
> work for hi1.4xlarge instances. In an attempt to fix this I noticed that
> these were not correctly specified in jclouds 1.5.1 (fixed in jclouds
> 1.6.0-SNAPSHOT). These are the differences between 1.5.1 and 1.6.0-SNAPSHOT.
> The virtualization type is now set to hvm:
> https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/blob/master/apis/ec2/src/main/java/org/jclouds/ec2/compute/domain/EC2HardwareBuilder.java#L359
> and the hi1.4xlarge are built with ccAMI support:
> https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/blob/master/providers/aws-ec2/src/main/java/org/jclouds/aws/ec2/compute/suppliers/AWSEC2HardwareSupplier.java#L71
> I cloned jclouds 1.5.1 and patched these differences locally. I compiled
> whirr 0.8.1 against this, and while the virtualization type is now correct,
> placement groups are still not created for hi1.4xlarge.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
