igor.vaynberg wrote: > > a good secondary action will be to reopen that issue, so matej knows there > is a problem in case he doesnt read this thread. > Igor, Thanks for the quick response and the advice. Matej is now aware of the issue. For anyone interested, the dissection of the problem can be found on the comments of WICKET-836.
Regards, JM -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Feedback-completely-broken-after-commit-of-WICKET-836---tf4556779.html#a13024035 Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
