Well, there are still circumstances where it can be useful, e.g. request timeout, or other http error.
-Matej On 10/16/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/16/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, tbh, I don't know either. I think it's supposed to handle a > > failure such as server not responding right now. I know before It > > handled even exceptions, but i guess it's better to just display the > > error page as we would normally do (which is current behavior). > > Does that mean that callback is obsolete now then? > > Eelco >
