On Dec 15, 2007 10:31 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > are we ok with this? the policy so far has been that minor releases > are binary compatible, so we cant have api breaks between 1.4.0 and > 1.4.1 just for sake of adding new features... that is why i said after > 1.4.0 is out we would have to immediately start on 1.5.0....
I guess. So then the naming changes. But the same idea applies: we don't support 1.4.0 as a separate entity. Where do you think we'll need API breaks to start with btw? Eelco
