On Jan 20, 2008 8:35 AM, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [x Yes, this numbering scheme seems reasonable
-igor
- VOTE: return to 1.3 numbering because 1.3.0-snapshot an... Martijn Dashorst
- Re: VOTE: return to 1.3 numbering because 1.3.0-sn... Igor Vaynberg
- Re: VOTE: return to 1.3 numbering because 1.3.... Juergen Donnerstag
- Re: VOTE: return to 1.3 numbering because 1.3.0-sn... Johan Compagner
- Re: VOTE: return to 1.3 numbering because 1.3.0-sn... Gerolf Seitz
- Re: VOTE: return to 1.3 numbering because 1.3.0-sn... Janne Hietamäki
- Re: VOTE: return to 1.3 numbering because 1.3.0-sn... Eelco Hillenius
- Re: VOTE: return to 1.3 numbering because 1.3.0-sn... Frank Bille
- Re: VOTE: return to 1.3 numbering because 1.3.0-sn... Gwyn Evans
- Re: VOTE: return to 1.3 numbering because 1.3.... Martijn Dashorst
- Re: VOTE: return to 1.3 numbering because ... Frank Bille
- Re: VOTE: return to 1.3 numbering beca... Gerolf Seitz
