Yeah, nothing makes me itch more than seeing public fields. Regardless,
I give paul at least credit for completing a screencast; but I wouldn't
say he did a good job (sorry paul, i don't mean to hurt your feelings)

Michael Chang wrote:
> Considering the GHOP deadline is in four hours, I think someone needs to
> decide whether or not to award Paul credit for completing the task. He did
> follow the instructions that were available on the website, and I don't
> think we can blame him for doing otherwise.
> 
> It would be nice if someone could provide an updated example which resolves
> the problems you've indicated, Robby, but that will take time, so...
> 
> On Feb 3, 2008 10:25 PM, Robby O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> By "We" I mean the people in the chan, i'm not a wicket dev.
>> Robby O'Connor wrote:
>>> We were discussing this on irc; it is well...a bit outdated...no
>>> generics, public fields...basically everything i mentioned in my
>>> critique (if you can call it that).
>>> Michael Chang wrote:
>>>> On Feb 3, 2008 8:52 AM, Paul Filimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I know that Java automatically calls toString method but I tried to
>>>>> follow the Wicket example.
>>>> I'm wondering, does anybody on the team know why the example does this?
>> Is
>>>> it possible/okay to change it?
>>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> 

Reply via email to