Does this mean that Tim can stop his sync-ing and generation of JavaDocs on the p.a.o site? Do we link to this directory on our website anywhere?
Martijn On 2/9/08, Igor Vaynberg (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel] > > Igor Vaynberg resolved WICKET-1306. > ----------------------------------- > > Resolution: Invalid > Assignee: Igor Vaynberg > > the link you point to is not our official javadoc > > our official javadoc is in the maven repo. if you want to view online > there is a refreshed version here: wicketstuff.org/wicket13doc > > for fragment see here > > > http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13doc/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/panel/Fragment.html > > > CLONE - Correct javadoc for Fragment > > ------------------------------------ > > > > Key: WICKET-1306 > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1306 > > Project: Wicket > > Issue Type: Improvement > > Components: wicket > > Affects Versions: 1.3.0-final > > Reporter: Craig McIlwee > > Assignee: Igor Vaynberg > > Priority: Minor > > Fix For: 1.3.2 > > > > Original Estimate: 0.25h > > Remaining Estimate: 0.25h > > > > The Fragment constructors without markupProvider argument have been > deprecated but the example in the class javadoc's is still using it. > > CLONE: > > This still not reflected in the javadocs that are linked from the main > project page (http://people.apache.org/~tobrien/wicket/apidocs/index.html) > > In addition to the example using the deprecated constructors, the > constructors themselves are not marked as deprecated in the documentation. > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. > > -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1
