Look at the subject! :) it is that question. On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> well, at least until we have a discussion and agree that we are at a > good cut off point > > backlog for 1.3 is pretty big, with some important things. if we cut > off now we have to apply patches across two branches :| > > -igor > > > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > i thought we only waited for 1.3.1 but how long are we going to stall on > > this? > > 1.3.4? > > > > Most of my things are all next gen. > > > > johan > > > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Igor Vaynberg < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > already? so we are not waiting for 1.3.3? there are still a lot of > > > issues for 1.3.x in jira... > > > > > > -igor > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Johan Compagner < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > i can do that but i guess not many people are then using it (and > > > creating > > > > again patches) > > > > > > > > johan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Martijn Dashorst < > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Why not attach a patch to > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-767? > > > > > > > > > > Martijn > > > > > > > > > > On 3/16/08, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I started working on generifying wicket and i am already > pretty > > > well on > > > > > the > > > > > > way > > > > > > Major parts are done already, But i am coming to a point that > i > > > like to > > > > > > check in in so that others can jump in and send in patches > for > > > certain > > > > > > area's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > johan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst > > > > > Apache Wicket 1.3.2 is released > > > > > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
