wicket itself doesn't, but something *cough*spring*cough* does, and it gets included in our examples project.
Martijn On 3/25/08, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > commons-logging? Seriously?? *shudders* > > Why does wicket depend on commons-logging when slfj is used? > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Timo Rantalaiho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > > > -1 > > > > > > Upgrading these kind of things in a stable release is not preferred. > > > Like Gerolf says: it is unclear which dependencies these projects > > > have, whether they have Java 5 deps etc. > > > > > > Upgrading to maintenance versions should be ok but frowned upon, minor > > > or major version upgrades should not be done at all in a maintenance > > > release. The only caveat is when a bug in a dependency has a direct > > > impact on wicket code, and the bug is only solved in a minor or major > > > version update. > > > > OK, maybe it's better to be conservative here. ...Though > > getting old versions as transitive dependencies is frowned > > upon ;) > > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > Timo > > > > -- > > Timo Rantalaiho > > Reaktor Innovations Oy <URL: http://www.ri.fi/ > > > > -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.2 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.2
